Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 17:33:52 -0700 Subject: Torsion fields, golden section pyramid Dear friends, Here is a bit more info which appears to be related to James' post on torsion fields: ----- Begin Forwarded Message ----- Introduction: this paper is in a non-traditional format. This was done for a reason. I was torn between releasing a highly scientific paper that most would not understand and releasing a non-technical document that would be disregarded by the scientific community. With this format, I may have the best (or worst) of both. I'm not sure which. I am, however, working on a journal-ready treatise. Here is a missing chapter from a future physics book. Chapter 7: Antigravity by Joshua Gulick Section 1: What is antigravity? Section 2: How was antigravity harnessed? Section 1: What is antigravity? As was noted in Chapter 2, Einstein's "cosmological constant," a postulated minute repulsion force necessary to account for the absence of universal gravitational compression was not completely rejected until 1999 when it was discovered that it was not a constant at all, but must have varied over the universe's life. Equations didn't allow for the acceleration of the newborn universe accurately without increasing the cosmological constant. Also that year, it was determined that the beautiful, unexplained, axial jets of matter and x-rays and gamma rays observed from black holes, neutron stars and galactic centers were the result of a repulsive force arising perpendicular to their rotation. [see http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/newhome/ headlines/ast11jun97_1.htm for info on these jets. Note that the jets appear to turn on and off as one would expect if matter passed over the axial repulsive fields variably] The repulsive effect is so strong from galactic centers that if our sun were placed in the repulsive field, its entire mass would be accelerated almost instantly to a speed quite near to the speed of light. Not only that, but the light emitted by the sun would be compressed to x-ray and gamma-ray energies as it traveled down the repulsion gradient. This wavelength compression happens in an opposite fashion to the wavelength expansion that is theorized to occur as light nears a massive gravitational source. Soon after these discoveries were described, the"cosmological constant" was discarded and equations describing the antigravitic effect substituted. The antigravitic effect is best visualized as a two-body interaction. Assume the two bodies have equal mass and therefore equal gravitational pull. Assume the bodies are in a stable orbit around one another, maintaining an equal distance between them. The bodies orbit in a single plane around a single axis. As they orbit, a repulsive force is emitted from each body perpendicular to the orbital plane. The force is equal to each body's resistance to the gravitational pull of the other. In other words, the resistance to orbital compression is redirected perpendicular to the orbital plane. In our example, the average repulsive effect could be visualized as a cylinder or repulsion perpendicular to the orbital plane and intersecting with the orbital path. The repulsive force increases exponentially as the orbital plane is approached. As the mass and orbital speeds increase, the antigravity forces are likewise increased. In most situations, the antigravity force is insignificant, due, in part, to the perpendicularity of the effect and also because the gravitational forces resisted are normally minute. This is why the "cosmological constant" was set so low and often questioned. However, a black hole's gravitational pull is hardly small. It's this incredibly strong gravity that causes the huge antigravitic displays from black holes as their cores rotate and resist further compression. Descriptive equations of antigravitic interactions are only simple in two dimensions. It's impossible to predict the repulsive effect generated by the complex and variable rotation of our sun. Suffice it to say that repulsion is strongest from the axis and negligible from the plane of rotation. It is this repulsive effect that accounts for the planarity, or disk-like shape of our own solar system and the repulsion of enough matter to form our Oort cloud. It is also this effect that accounts for the planarity of a black hole's accretion disk and even the planarity of galaxies. Section 2: How was antigravity harnessed? No discussion of antigravity would be complete without discussing the discoveries that allowed humanity to harness the repulsive force. In 1999 again, it was discovered that the antigravity effect could be duplicated in a laboratory by spinning atomic nuclei at very high speeds. An atom's nucleus is ultra-dense, not so unlike a tiny black hole. Because nuclei rotate fairly stabily and without friction, it is possible to accelerate their rotation to their maximum speed and produce very strong antigravitic effects. So, how does one make nuclei rotate? It was discovered that certain nucleic geometries reflect, to a small degree, the movements of nearby electrons. The elements that exhibit such geometries have an odd number of protons and an even number of neutrons. In such atoms, the protons are not uniformly dispersed throughout the nucleus. Instead, one side of the nucleus is slightly more positive than the other. Elements that have this unbalanced nuclear charge are called electro-rotational elements. They exhibit a slight natural antigravitic effect which may be deduced by observing their atomic radii. The atomic radii of electro-rotational elements are significantly smaller than expected due to the repulsive effect generated by neighboring atoms. The electro-rotational element with the most massive nucleus is Bismuth, element 83. Its nucleus has the greatest gravitational pull and therefore can demonstrate the largest antigravitic effect when spun. It was discovered that a sufficient electrical charge passed down a micro-thin ribbon of Bismuth sped and aligned the rotation of the Bismuth nuclei so that the axis were aligned perpendicular to the electrical flow. It was also discovered that micro-layers of Bismuth exhibit near superconductive properties at room temperature. This near superconductivity happens as the nuclei spin at very high speeds and act as miniature flywheels, guiding the electron flow and reducing electrical resistance. [Note from Joshua 4/24/99: my latest findings seems to suggest that micro-filaments and micro-layers of Bismuth exhibit true supeconductivity at room temperature. See the info on the first page of my website.] The first atomic antigravitic device was constructed in 1999. My, that was a busy year! The device was simply a 10 centimeter wide ribbon of Bismuth half a kilometer long and an average of 3 microns thick. It was coiled around a hollow copper core with a similar, 25-micron thick dielectric ribbon coiled around the core and between each Bismuth layer. The free end of the bismuth ribbon was grounded. When a high-voltage charge was applied to the copper core, the device punched through the ceiling and roof of the lab at a speed that was later estimated to be around Mach 8. The antigravity platforms that we see every day use three standard antigravity generators of this type mounted at angles around an axis with 120 degrees separating each. Other designs were explored. One of the most successful ideas was to apply the Bismuth and dielectric layers directly to the exterior surface of a craft. This antigravitic "skin" slightly lowered manufacturing costs and allowed easier repairs. It also allowed us to explore our solar system with a greater safety factor and at higher speeds due to the protection from micro-meteorites offered by the repulsion field that surrounded the craft. [To see some fragments of actual antigravitic "skin" and learn about them, visit http://www.artbell.com/rosreprt.html] The first shape to get its antigravitic skin was the cigar shape. It was coated with the successive Bismuth and dielectric layers. When a sufficient high-voltage charge was passed across the Bismuth micro-layers from one end to the other, the repulsive field was generated tangential to the "skin" and perpendicular to the axis plane, giving a nice, stable lift. With the addition of two standard antigrav generators (one at each end of the cigar) maneuverability was achieved. The traditional "flying saucer" shape was explored next. It was coated similarly and charged from top to bottom. Again, the repulsive field was generated tangential to the "skin" and perpendicular to the axis plane. Sitting on the ground, it repulsed laterally, providing zero lift. To direct the repulsion force from the lateral, the electrical flow needed to be made to travel around the axis instead of taking the shortest, fastest route between poles. The closer the spiraling of the electron flow, the closer the repulsive field aligns with the axis plane and therefore repulses more up and down. This spiraling was accomplished first with a spirally wound core and then more efficiently with a winding just deep of exterior surface. With this design, only one standard antigrav generator mounted axially is needed to provide maneuverability. [Note from Joshua 4/24/99: the addition of a ferrous layer near the winding, may or may not increase efficiency. I don't know. Using pulsed, high voltage DC, it's possible that in such an arrangement, nucleic rotation would be affected by both the electrical flow and the magnetic field.] There are limitations to these craft arising from the fact that all the repulsive forces are directed tangential to the surface and never reach the interior of the craft. This limited the acceleration and deceleration to that which a human body could withstand. Then somebody had a brilliant idea. Why not put the occupants outside, on top of the craft. This way, the repulsion forces generated would, to a large degree, counter- balance the inertial forces on occupants as the craft accelerated. This is why we see domes on the top of early designs. Eventually, it was discovered that by using an exterior surface that had a sine wave ripple instead of a smooth surface, the repulsive effect could be directed into the interior. In conclusion: Antigravity has allowed us to safely explore our solar system and to send explorers at high speeds to nearby stars. It gave us unlimited, clean, electrical power. It brought humanity together as nothing had before and caused us all to think seriously about our collective future. It eliminated much of our pollution and allowed our planet to begin to heal. It also made everyone look carefully at the magnificent design of the Universe and consider that it may have been intelligently created. A personal statement from the author Of course, this information is not really from the future any more than I am. This information is, however, factual, though perhaps not chronologically correct. And now, I would like to personally and sincerely apologize to the individuals, governments and corporate entities that may have to change their plans, and/or accept financial and other losses due to the release of this knowledge. However, I believe that it is quite proper now to release this information and allow our society its rightful technological leap. For if antigravity itself does not allow super-efficient electrical generation due to the Laws of Conservation, it certainly does provide the means to supply our entire electrical requirements. For, with simple antigravity platforms high in the atmosphere and very long wires reaching down to the ground, as Tesla proposed, we may siphon off as much electricity as we like from our atmosphere, which is continually being recharged anyway. In order to offset the negative a bit, I presently offer my ideas, designs, and theories, indeed my antigravitational technology, and my ability to profit from it - to every individual, government, and corporate entity. But only if we agree to one condition. We have to share it. And we have to help those whose lives are disrupted due to it. Oh, that's two conditions. Well, we should do both, but we must share. Oh, it will be weird to see strange things floating around. I wonder if they'll make the horses bolt? For more information on this and my other research, or to comment on this paper, please contact me at: Joshua Gulick 69 and One Half N. Franklin Street Delaware, OH 43015 or you may use my e-mail address: joshua.gulick@cheerful.com But, I would rather you use the bulletin board on my site: http://www.freez.com/joshua ------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:29:02 -0700 To: WhiteGold@zz.com Subject: Torsion fields, golden section pyramid Dear James, At 12:55 PM 6/3/99 -0500, you wrote: >To: >Subject: Torsion fields, golden section pyramid >Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 04:34:53 -0700 > >There is an interesting description of torsion fields at > >http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/tors/ > >Read the articles by Nachalov/Parkhomov/Sokolov, also Akimov/Shipov.= Torsion >fields are generated by spin, thus all objects have an associated torsion >field due to the spin state of their individual atoms. Torsion waves are >apparently propagated at 10 to 9th power of speed of light. It is= considered >that these fields may be responsible for PK and ESP effects. The mass or >inertial density (whatever) of an object is also apparently controllable by >the torsion field. > >Static torsion fields are also apparently generated by objects of a >particular shape, such as a pyramid. The above page includes a link to the >HYDROMETPRIBOR Russian pyramid enterprise, which is apparently uses a gold >section pyramid to generate environmental fields. This is an elongated >pyramid shape appears very similar to the alleged Egyptian symbol for ORME >material. > >One might guess that the alleged anomalous spin state of ORME material= might >be capable of interaction with the torsion fields of normal matter, thus >creating various effects. This web site has a wealth of great information. It will take some time to digest it. I think that you are onto something here. I had previously read some of A. A. Shpilman's theories and found that they relate quite well with various ORMUS theories. I have been working on an article to link some of these concepts with the ORMUS materials. Here is what I have so far: There are strong indications that the ORMUS materials are related to superconductive levitation through vortex energy effects. The ORMUS elements have been observed to levitate on magnetic fields and otherwise. David Hudson mentioned this phenomenon in his Dallas lecture: "After about 9 or 10 months of doing these studies by computer control, day and night, every day, month after month, what we found is when the material goes snow white, it weighs 56 percent of the true weight. Now that should bother you, I hope. You say, where's the mass going? Why isn't it weigh-able anymore? And by repeated annealing we could make the material weigh less than the pan weighed it was sitting in, which was less than nothing, or we could make it weigh 300-400 times what its beginning weight was, depending on whether we were heating or cooling it. Yet the machine is built with magnetic standards, that you could actually put in the machine, and the materials are non-magnetic, then at a certain temperature they become magnetic, then at another temperature they lose their magnetism, to check the machine and see if there's any effect of it's magnetic field from the heating coil that's effecting the weight of the material. And yet the magnetic materials have no effect at all. Yet when you put this material in and literally take it quantitatively to the white form, the material only weighs 56 percent of the true weight." David Hudson demonstrated anti-gravity effects by heating ORMUS iridium to 830 degrees. A chart illustrating this can be found at: http://www.triax.com/bmnfa/science/ORMUS/Patents/figur012.gif Other researchers report that they have observed a similar levitation phenomenon with these materials at room temperature. The question arises as to whether the ORMUS superconductors are magnetically levitating or gravitationally levitating. There are some recent scientific experiments which suggest that superconductivity, magnetic levitation and gravitational shielding or levitation are related. In the early 1990s Eugene E. Podkletnov, a Russian materials scientist then at Tampere University of Technology in Finland, reported gravity-attenuation effects in his experiments. He reported that gravity is attenuated above a spinning superconductor. You can read more about Podkletnov's experiment and its replication on the following web pages: http://www.inetarena.com/~noetic/pls/gravity.html http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/BWantigrav.html http://www.padrak.com/ine/PODKLETNOV.html http://www.gravity.org/fur.htm The gravity attenuation effects seem to be related to the rate of spin of the superconductor and the frequency of the electromagnetic field which was magnetically levitating it. According to Podkletnov's paper(1), "[t]he shielding force depends on the rotational speed of the disk and has a tendency to increase with the speed of rotation." A non-rotating superconductor would still have a very small gravity attenuating effect. ("The sample with the initial weight of 5.47834 g was found to loose about 0.05% of its weight when placed over the levitating disk without any rotation.") So, the ORMUS materials, gravity, superconductivity and magnetic levitation seem to be related but how might these things be related to vortex forces and what sort of theory can we develop to account for all of these relationships? I will propose a theory about this later, but first, I would like to bring a few other concepts into the mix. Levitation is a concept which has also been related to sound and to certain states of consciousness. It would be nice if we could postulate a theory which would allow us to include these factors as facilitators for= levitation. Around the turn of the last century a couple of Theosophists made some psychic observations of atomic structure. A gentleman named Gary, who describes himself as a kundalini awakened American engineer, wrote a paper which describes Besant and Leadbeater's observations, as well as some of his own. This paper is available on the Web at: http://www.triax.com/bmnfa/science/ORMUS/research/paranorm.htm Following is Gary's introduction to his paper: Paranormal Observations of ORMEs Atomic Structure ------------------------------------------------- Between August 1895 and October 1933, Charles W. Leadbeater and Annie Besant of the Theosophical Society conducted clairvoyant studies of the atomic structure of the elements. Both of these individuals had previously awakened kundalini; Leadbeater has described his having done so by pranayama, which is the same method I used. After kundalini has been awakened, and after the ajna chakra (brow chakra) is fully functioning, it is possible to extend one's consciousness, specifically the faculty of vision, through great ranges in magnification capability, and either up or down in objective size. In yogic writings, this is part of what is allegorically referred to as the ability to make oneself very small or very large at will. These are the first and second of the eight major siddhis, the Sanskrit Anima and Mahima. The actual nature and extent of many of the siddhis, or paranormal powers, are often (intentionally) described allegorically, and so are widely misunderstood. Anima and Mahima actually each refer to several different things. One of these, or what actually happens, and is being referred to in the case of these observations, is that a projection from the ajna chakra is formed by the yogi; the functional aperture and gain of this protuberant projection or filament can be controlled by the yogi, according to the scale of the object under observation. This extended faculty is symbolically depicted in ancient Egyptian iconography by the small serpent on the pharaoh's forehead, which is dismissed by most Egyptologists as being just a part of the headdress. By its means, one is capable of seeing objects far smaller and far more distant than is possible by means of any man-made instruments yet devised. Leadbeater, for example, describes an entire spectrum of particle sizes below the subatomic particles which make up physical atoms. The results of Leadbeater's and Besant's investigations were published serially as articles in the magazine, The Theosophist. The material was later arranged and published in 1909 in a book titled "Occult Chemistry", which was revised in a second edition in 1919. In 1951, a much enlarged and revised third edition (396 pages) was published in Adyar, Madras, India. I am fortunate to have copies of these two later editions. Over twenty years ago, in the 1970's, I corresponded at length with the Theosophical Society's Olcott Library, and they graciously provided me with a good deal of further information. Since that time, and during my own studies, I have awaited in hopes that the Theosophical Society would reprint all the original material. This has not yet occurred, though I continue to hope for it. Editions of Occult Chemistry are now very rare and difficult to find. However, a British physicist named Stephen Phillips became aware of this material, and in 1980 published a book titled "Extra-Sensory Perception of Quarks", describing the two Theosophist's work and interpreting it in the light of modern atomic theory. Though the atomic structures observed by the yogic faculty, as described by Leadbeater and Besant, did not make much sense to their contemporaries, present day theories of atomic structure and particle physics make their descriptions much more recognizable, validated, and startlingly accurate, as Dr. Phillips was amazed to discover. Phillip's book was published before the high spin state was recognized, and so he does not discuss it from this aspect. However, he does notice how the observations match the Higgs superconducting vacuum model, recognizes non-Abelian monopoles with Nielsen-Olesen vortices as carrying quantized flux, and identifies the mechanisms at work underlying quark stability, among many other things. All in all, he did a fine job of it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>End of Quote<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Gary further describes his observations of these subatomic structures: "If one takes an anu, and uses the Will to take it apart and completely dissociate it, this can be done, but as soon as the Will is released, the anu reforms again. It is like taking a piece of slinky spring, and unwinding it by stretching it out and pressing it flat on the floor with your hands. But as soon as you let go, it pops back. The individual anu are each (one discovers) direct force-aspect manifestations of a higher Will, which generates and sustains all the matter in the Universe. It is... in very fact, the "Force", which is with us. This Force originates from a dimension far higher than we (certainly, I) can reach while still clinging to corporeal form. When we try to conceive of the stupendous number of anu, throughout all matter of the visible galaxies, which are being held in existence in such manner, the extent and scope of that Will is truly mind numbing." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>End of Quote<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< The following excerpt from Occult Chemistry was written by C. W. Leadbeater in 1907. It describes the fractal vortex structure of these subatomic particles. Note the strong similarities to modern superstring theory and the concept of quantum foam: "To help us to understand more clearly let us examine the ultimate atom of the physical plane. (See Figs. 3 and 6.) It is composed of ten rings or wires, which lie side by side, but never touch one another. If one of these wires be taken away from the atom, and as it were untwisted from its peculiar spiral shape and laid out on a flat surface, it will be seen that it is a complete circle=97a tightly twisted endless coil. This coil is itsel= f a spiral containing 1,680 turns; it can be unwound. and it will then make a much larger circle. There are in each wire seven sets of such coils or spirillae, each finer than the preceding coil to which its axis lies at right angles. The process of unwinding them in succession may be continued until we have nothing but an enormous circle of the tiniest imaginable dots lying like pearls upon an invisible string. These dots are so inconceivably small that many millions of them are needed to make one ultimate physical atom. They appear to be the basis of all matter of which we at present know anything; astral. mental and buddhic atoms also are built of them, so we may regard them as the fundamental units of which all material atoms on any plane yet attainable are composed. These units are all alike, spherical and absolutely simple in construction. Though they are the basis of all matter, they are not themselves matter; they are not blocks but bubbles. They do not resemble bubbles floating in the air, which consist of a thin film of water separating the air within them from the air outside, so that the film has both an outer and an inner surface. Their analogy is rather with the bubbles that we see rising in water, bubbles which may be said to have only one surface=97that of the wate= r which is pushed back by the confined air. Just as the bubbles are not water, but are precisely the spots from which water is absent, so these units are not koilon but the absence of koilon=97 the only spots where it is not=97specks of nothingness floating in it. so to speak, for the interior of these space-bubbles is an absolute void to the highest power of vision that we can turn upon them. What then is their real content=97the tremendous force that can blow bubbles in a material of infinite density? What but the creative power of the Logos, the Breath which He breathes into the waters of space when He wills that manifestation shall commence? These infinitesimal bubbles are the "holes" which "Fohat digs in space"; the Logos Himself fills them, and holds them in existence against the pressure of the koilon because He Himself is in them. These units of force are the bricks which He uses in the building of His universe, and everything that we call matter, on however high or low a place it may be, is composed of these and so is divine in its very essence. The Outbreathing which makes these bubbles is quite distinct from and long antecedent to the Three Outpourings which have been so frequently discussed in Theosophical literature; it is not even certain whether it is the work of the Solar Logos or of One a stage higher still, The later Outpourings whirl the bubbles into the various arrangements which we call the atoms of the severe,, planes, and then aggregate those atoms into the molecules of the chemical elements. Thus the worlds are gradually built up, but always out of this selfsame material which to us seems nothingness, and yet is divine power. It is indeed a veritable creation, a building of something out of nothing=97of wha= t we call matter out of a privation of matter." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>End of Quotes<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< The drawing which accompanies this description is available on the Web at: http://www.triax.com/bmnfa/science/ORMUS/research/SPIRAL.gif Other modern physicists have noted the similarity between the descriptions of subatomic particles described by Leadbeater and Besant and certain modern quantum physical descriptions of these same structures. One physicist, Tony Smith, has even used a picture from Occult Chemistry to illustrate one of these modern quantum physics descriptions called the "Compton radius vortex".(3) Please keep in mind that these subatomic structures can better be characterized as structures of the movement of energy than structures of "solid matter". It is clear that the vortex shape of the koilon is echoed in descriptions of these same subatomic structures according to modern quantum physics and there are other vortex or spiral shapes which also appear to be related. The atomic structure of the microtubule follows a spiral pattern. DNA has the classic double helix structure. Dan Winter, on his web page(4), compares the spiral structure of the anu with the energy movement structure in the interior of the sun and also with the spiral structure of the heart. An article in "New Scientist" (6 February 1999 Vol. 161 No. 2172, pp. 32-37) talks about a recent discovery, by researchers at Harvard Medical School and MIT, that the major blood vessels have a spiral shape which maintains a helical flow of blood. This vortex action prevents turbulent blood flow which has been implicated in cholesterol build up on the walls of blood vessels. A new artificial heart design takes advantage of this phenomena by creating a helical blood flow through vortex action. Vortex Levitation Theory All of the circumstances under which the m-state elements loose weight could be characterized as when energy of one sort or another is added to the superconducting ORMUS Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) system. One effect of superconductors is that they exclude all magnetic fields. This effect is called the Meissner effect and is named after the scientist who discovered it. Bosons are symmetric atomic particles which have an even number of electrons. The individual atoms composing a superconductor must be bosons. ORMUS superconductivity happens when the electrons in an atomic system become paired up. This process is called Cooper pairing after the scientist who discovered it. These paired electrons are no longer available for valence bonding with other atoms. If you have an element with an uneven number of electrons, this single atom cannot have all of its electrons paired up. In order for Cooper pairing to occur in such an element you must have at least two atoms together. When two atoms of the same element pair up in this way, both their nucleus and their electron cloud become superimposed on one another and they begin to behave as a single atom. We postulate that this situation might be related to the weight difference between the m-state and the metallic state. When this diatomic structure is in close enough proximity to other diatoms of the same element, they resonance connect through the Coulomb force. If you have a great pile of these diatoms which are connected through the Coulomb force they will also behave as a single atom since they are quantum coupled. A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is a bunch of atoms which are in the same quantum state and therefore behave as a single atom. The strength of the BEC superconductive state in the ORMUS materials depends on the proximity of the individual superconductive atoms to one another. For example, if these atoms are diffused in a large volume of water, they will have a weaker levitation response than if they are concentrated in a smaller volume of water. As impurities are driven out of the ORMUS materials in Hudson's hydrogen annealing process, these materials loose four ninths of their weight. According to our theory, this weight loss results from a substantial portion of these diatoms spinning in the same plane which is parallel to the surface of the earth. As the diatoms move into greater spin harmony, and as their spin energy increases they continue to loose weight until they are literally weightless. We postulate that any thing which adds energy to the ORMUS/BEC system will trigger this levitation. Sound, if properly tuned to a resonance frequency of the ORMUS/BEC system should work as well as anything else. David Hudson demonstrated anti-gravity effects by heating the ORMUS iridium to 830 degrees. A chart illustrating this can be found at: http://www.triax.com/bmnfa/science/ORMUS/Patents/figur012.gif The key seems to be to induce a coherent spin in a superconducting ORMUS BEC system on the atomic level which is parallel to the surface of the= earth. The best natural sources of the ORMUS elements are volcanic rock (like granite) and limestone. I understand that the Great Pyramid was made of rose granite and covered with the much softer white limestone. Both of these types of stone would be great candidates for levitation since they are rich in the ORMUS elements (about 10% by weight). The best natural sources of the ORMUS elements are volcanic rock (like granite) and limestone. I understand that the Great Pyramid was made of rose granite and covered with the much softer white limestone. Both of these types of stone would be great candidates for levitation since they are rich in the ORMUS elements (about 10% by weight). The Great Pyramid is also aligned very precisely in relation to the Earth's axis. In his early writings on pyramid energy, Dr. Patrick Flannigan described a vortex of energy which ascended from the apex of a pyramid= model. In the early seventies I attended one of Dr. Flannigan's workshops on pyramid energy. In this workshop he demonstrated the use of dowsing to identify the energies related to the pyramid shape. Several of the people at this workshop played with various dousing instruments and seemed to confirm Dr. Flannigan's findings. (This was not a controlled experiment at all so the results are merely suggestive of an area for exploration.) Patrick Flannigan's findings were that, in a properly oriented pyramid, the energy detected by dowsing increases on the edges of the pyramid faces. This energy increases further up these edges and exits the pyramid in a vortex from the apex. According to Dr. Flannigan, this energy can be detected directly above the pyramid regardless of how many floors one ascends in a building. Further, he claimed that all of these energies rapidly diminish as one moves the pyramid from perfect alignment with the Earth's axis. He also claimed that the vortex always spins in the same direction. These observations remind me of the vortex spin that water has as it goes down the drain in the bath. I understand that this spin is always in the same direction in relation to the spin of the Earth on its axis. What is the force which generates these phenomena? How is it imparted to vortex action around the world? These are questions that we might be better able to answer as we continue to work with the ORMUS materials. Since the ORMUS elements are generally considered to be responsive to mental influence, this could also be the source of energy which aligns these elements in a spin parallel to the earth's surface and induces anti-gravity effects. Several people who have ingested the ORMUS elements report that their psychic abilities are enhanced subsequent to this ingestion. Alchemists claim that the alchemical materials (which we believe belong in the ORMUS category of materials) are quite responsive to the thoughts of the= alchemist. Another reason that we think that the ORMUS elements are influenced by mind is that they are actually materialized by certain Hindu mystics. David Hudson has tested the material that one of these mystics produces and found that it is mostly ORMUS iridium. Here is a quote from his Dallas lecture on this: "(Question - It's really your Manna?) I think so. Anyway, that's my opinion. I haven't got any to analyze, but I can tell you that the Vibhuti, that Sai Baba manifests, in fact is iridium in the high-spin state. That we have analyzed, and he does ingest this material. Iridium polymerizes with hydrochloric acid, in the stomach you have hydrochloric acid and so when you take it in high amounts in your stomach and then he regurgitates this, and they call it, this plastic looking material they call Lingam. The word Lingam actually means semen. Well this Lingam he regurgitates and they worship it as the holy material, and he literally eats it in macro amounts. His body is totally saturated, and they claim he can bio-locate. Coincidentally." One of my colleagues actually saw Sai Baba manifest the vibhuti and other things. She wrote the following about that experience: "While I was in India, I learned that there are three types of vibhuti available in the ashram. The first is the gray vibhuti that is materialized by Sai Baba, there is a white vibhuti that is materialized by Sai Baba only during interviews, and another "bulk" gray vibhuti that is the produced by certain devotees in the ashram...[This] type of vibhuti is more gritty and has a sometimes bitter taste to it. The vibhuti that Sai Baba materializes is a very fine, smooth fragrant powder. Baba's vibhuti sometimes has a mildly minty taste, sometimes a mildly perfumed taste. I don't know if the "ordinary" vibhuti ash made by devotees would be improved by better, more thorough "firing"/burning. Children will eat both, but they devour Baba's vibhuti. I've seen Sai Baba materialize vibhuti from his hand. He waves his hand around in circles, palm down, in front of his chest, and then when he stops, it's like he grabs it out of the air and gives it to us. Other accounts of Baba making vibhuti in the little plastic packets that he gives out say that he is given the little plastic packets in a large container, the packets are unopened. He then waves his hand over the pile and they fill up with vibhuti. When he hands out the little packets, they are air tight and perfectly flat. Once you open the little packets, you never get them that straight, flat or air tight again. I did witness Sai Baba materialize a bracelet. I was fortunate enough to actually see it materialize--not everyone sees the actual materialization process. Sai Baba, as usual, when he materializes something, began waving his hand in a circular motion in front of himself, and below his hand the bracelet began materializing in the air space below his waving hand. It was as though it was being constructed molecule by molecule, almost as if it were being knitted. I could see these "particles" of energy converging on the spot where the bracelet was coming together. It was pretty neat, because it was as if these particles were bending space, in a way, as they moved toward the central spot. It emerged quite quickly, and there was almost a "rumbling" energy about it. When it was done, Baba just caught it/grabbed it--quite gracefully--It was the most incredible thing I've ever seen. I suspect that the vibhuti which he makes is formed in a similar manner."=20 Please note the circular motion that Sai Baba used while materializing the vibhuti and the bracelet. (1) Podkletnov, E. and R. Nieminen, Physica C 2O3 (1992) 441-444 North-Holland, A possibility of gravitational force shielding by bulk YBa2Cu3O7-x superconductor, Tampere University of Technology, Institute of Materials Science, P.O. Box 589, SF-33101 Tampere, Finland, Received 9 September 1992, Revised manuscript received 13 October 1992, http://www.inetarena.com/~noetic/pls/Papers/pc203.htm (2) Extra-Sensory Perception of Quarks, by Stephen M. Phillips, PhD, 1980, Theosophical Publishing House, Wheaton IL, ISBN 0-8356-0227-3, US $15.00. The abstract of a recent paper by Phillips on this subject is available on the Web at: http://www.jse.com/v9n4a2.html (3) Bohm Compton Radius Vortex Sidharth Sarfatti - http://tony.ai/Sidharth.html (4) http://danwinter.com/heartsun/HeartofSun.html ------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 17:35:44 -0700 To: WhiteGold@zz.com Subject: Torsion fields, golden section pyramid Dear friends, The following also appears to be strongly related: Date: 9 May 1999 21:40:49 -0000 From: "David Crockett Williams" To: Science & Spirituality List Reply-to: "David Crockett Williams" Subject: [science-l] DePalma on free energy, anti-gravity, space-drive, and the future of science DePalma on free energy, anti-gravity, space-drive, and the future of science http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/2depalma.html The following was prepared as an information offering for the network of collaborators associated with the Internet Science Education Project http://www.hia.com/pcr/vigier/isep.html Recent work in theoretical physics to evaluate the potential of new energy technologies may be furthered by more careful evaluation, replication, and expansion of the experiments done in the 1970's by the late Bruce DePalma, experiments which document anomalous influences of rotation on the gravitational, inertial, and electromagnetic properties of rotating objects. The following is an overview of some of these results presented on the DePalma website http://www.depalma.pair.com with some additional information from personal experiences of this writer with DePalma in Santa Barbara, California, beginning in May of 1979. Bruce DePalma graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1958. He attended graduate school in Electrical Engineering and Physics at M.I.T. and Harvard University. At M.I.T. he was a lecturer in Photographic Science in the Laboratory of Dr. Harold Edgerton and directed 3-D color photographic research for Dr. Edwin Land of Polaroid Corporation. He commenced his work in Free Energy through his studies on the gyroscope and the nature of motion. He invented the N-machine, a free energy electrical generator for which he is most widely known. To the physicist though, it may be his earlier experiments that led him to this discovery which are of even more significant interest. Some of these will be summarized here after a review of the circumstances by which DePalma came to Santa Barbara in 1978 to verify his prediction of the n-Machine, a prediction made as a result of his understanding of the "energy field in space itself" which he felt interacted with rotating objects to produce his previously observed anomalous rotation effects. During the 1970's the third largest "new age" community in the U.S. was located in Santa Barbara, the Sunburst Community founded by Norman Paulsen who previously was a close disciple of Paramahansa Yogananda but whose philosophical perspective was deeply influenced by his purported multiple encounters with "UFO's" including direct interactions as he reported in his autobiography published in 1980 "Sunburst: Return of the Ancients". Based on his experiences Paulsen is convinced that his encounters were with beings responsible for ancient and future civilizations on Earth whose "spacecraft" also have the capability of time travel. Normally I would not bring such a story to the attention of theoretical physicists but this might be appropriate here because of its connection to the history of DePalma's N-machine experiments. Paulsen was the one who brought Bruce DePalma to Santa Barbara in 1978 and sponsored the first quantitative tests of DePalma's n-Machine overunity homopolar generator. According to Paulsen's autobiography, during one of his numerous encounters with either advanced or non-human intelligences of superior technological capabilities, he was taken aboard a spacecraft on a round trip to Jupiter during which time he communicated telepathically with the piloting beings who communicated to him how the power-plant on their ship worked. From his description of this information I believe that the reason he sponsored DePalma was because of how the n-Machine idea correlated with what he was "told" on that journey. In addition, if one takes seriously the authenticity of DePalma's preceding carefully measured anomalous influences of rotation on the physical properties of material objects, it seems likely that in the deeper understanding of these results may lie keys to the development of spacedrive and/or antigravity technologies as well as devices to extract usable energy as electricity or heat from the "energy field inherent in space itself" that he felt his experiments measured. If one believes that DePalma was either incompetent or dishonest in his work, it is very easy to dismiss the enormous implications of these experiments, but having known him fairly well over a period of 13 years in Santa Barbara and being acquainted with several of his research colleagues with whom I am still in contact, I am convinced that he was both capable and honest in all of his scientific research so I would like to offer the following summary for consideration. To finish with the Paulsen connection here I will relate what Norman wrote in his book about the power plant of this "spacecraft". The information conveyed to him was that the ship's propulsion was due to the effect of two magnetic discs rotating in opposite directions. The relationship of their axes of rotation was not mentioned. The interesting "coincidence" was that he was "told" that "if you take one half of this propulsion system, with it can be made a device to produce power for the people on Earth which would be far better that technologies in current use". Apparently when DePalma's schematic for the n-Machine prediction was brought to Paulsen's attention he recognized it as fulfilling this message. The rest of this document may be considered independent of the "twilight zone" aspects of this story as I will attempt to briefly describe some of the relevant keystone experimental results which led DePalma to the prediction and verification of what he called the n-Principle behind this "overunity" electric power generator which turns out to have been an independent rediscovery and expansion on Faraday's homopolar (or unipolar) motor/generator principle (apparently different from induction) first entered in his diary at Christmastime 1831. Faraday's diary diagram and DePalma's discussion of this effect are at http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity08/FaradayDisc.html in his 1 February 1995 notes on "The secret of the Faraday disc". Again, the big presumption here is that these experiments were carefully and honestly done by a competent researcher, which I believe they were. The pity is that the results seem to be so contradictory to the established body of knowledge in theoretical physics I have yet to find anyone beside Dr. Paramahamsa Tewari of India and Dr. Shiuji Inomata of Japan who have any kind of theoretical interpretation of how the "overunity effect" of n-Machine works (whose performance they have each verified), let alone anyone at all who can offer explanation of the numerous preceding experiments documenting previously unsuspected influences of rotation on physical objects, some described below having potential applications to spacedrive engineering. It is my hope that some qualified experimenters will take the following seriously enough to allocate the time and funding to replicate these results and that during the same time frame some integrated theoretical understanding may be developed to enable their publication in the peer reviewed literature without their apparent contradiction of certain cherished "fundamental laws" of physics. Two chapters of Dr. Tewari's book [PHYSICS OF FREE POWER GENERATION (BEYOND MATTER), by Paramahamsa Tewari, Published by Crest Publishing House, New Delhi, INDIA, 1996 ISBN No: 81-242-0113-7] describing his "Space Vortex Theory" interpretations of related physics, including his view on the structure of the electron, can be found at http://depalma.pair.com/Tewari/Chap7.html GENESIS OF FREE POWER GENERATION, and at http://depalma.pair.com/Tewari/Chap8.html LIMITATION OF THE LAW OF ENERGY CONSERVATION whose abstract on space power generation mentions Tewari's n-Machine Space Power Generator test results, explains that "The energy-balance shows that the output exceeds input by 3690 watts, which is in violation of the law of conservation of energy in this specific experiment involving electro-magnetic induction effect", and discusses gravity field production, gravity field variation due to oscillation, light from atomic vibration, and electromagnetic interactions between atoms. The turning point in DePalma's scientific career came while he was a lecturer at MIT in the late 1960's and he began pondering the inadequacies of explaining the physics of the gyroscope and he began wondering if there was a deeper principle operating in the behavior of rotating objects. One of the first experiments that DePalma did in this area was to test to see if there is a difference in the gravitational behavior of a spinning vs non-spinning ball bearing. After an extensive literature search prompted by a question from one of his students at MIT, they could not find any evidence that this experiment had ever been done and so it became an educational exercise to see if in fact this variation on Galileo's "big rock vs. small rock" experiment would show any variation in the rate of fall. At that time Bruce was a senior scientist specializing in photographic sciences with the Polaroid Corporation and lecturing part time at MIT on photographic science, physics, and electrical engineering over a period of several years in the late 1960's. He set up this experiment using two one-inch diameter pinball machine ball bearings where one was not spinning and one was made to spin at 18,000 rpm by a hand held router motor with cups to hold the balls, one on the spinning shaft and one affixed to the casing of the motor. He then he gave the assembly a thrust at an appropriate angle and in the dark with a 60 cycle strobe light and open camera lens he photographed the parallel trajectories of the two ball bearings. Repeating this numerous times and analyzing the photographs, this experiment showed that there is indeed a variation in the gravitational behavior of the spinning vs non-spinning ball bearing. The spinning ball, given the same thrust, went to a higher point in its trajectory, fell faster and hit the bottom of the trajectory before the non-spinning ball. Later he made a device with a magnetic release which could test this small but significant, reproducible, and clearly visually perceptible effect with a stationary vertical drop over a height of just six feet. After years of reflection on these results he wrote an evaluation on 3 May 1977 called "Understanding the Dropping of the Spinning Ball Experiment" http://depalma.pair.com/SpinningBall(Understanding).html The essence of this experiment was duplicated with another setup using spinning vs non-spinning enclosed gyroscopes to control for aerodynamic factors and these results are posted in "GYRO DROP EXPERIMENT" http://depalma.pair.com/gyrodrop.html Performed by Kenneth Gerber, M.D., Richard F. Merritt, Analysis by Edward Delvers An overview of some of these rotational anomalies is discussed in DePalma's 4 November 1974 "Fundamental Discoveries of the New Physics and Mathematics and their Relationship to the UFO Flying Saucer Observations and Encounters" http://depalma.pair.com/NewPhys&UFOs.html "1) Rotating objects falling in a gravitational field are accelerated at a rate greater than "G", the commonly accepted rate for non-rotating objects falling in a vacuum. 2) Pendula utilizing bob weights which are rotating, swing nonsinusoidally with periods increased over those of pendula with non-rotating bobs. 3) A precessing gyroscope has an anomalous inertial mass, greater than its gravitational mass. 4) An anomalous field phenomenon has been discovered, the OD field, which confers inertia on objects immersed within it. This field is generated by the constrained forced precession of a rotating gyroscope." One of the early devices that DePalma used to observe these effects consisted of an apparatus that he called the "force machine" which consisted of two counter-rotating gyroscopes described in "The Generation of a Unidirectional Force, 22 April 1974" http://depalma.pair.com/GenerationOfUnidirectionalForce.html as "The archetypal gravitational engine or Free Energy machine is a combination of two counter-rotating gyroscopes with axles parallel and rotors co-planar. The original Force Machine was constructed in 1971, figure (1). The total weight of the apparatus was 276 lbs. The "active" mass at the rim of the flywheels was 10 lbs. The assembly was suspended from a spring scale and the gyroscopes driven counter-rotating at 7600 r.p.m. Under these conditions the support cylinder was driven at 4 r.p.s. to precess the gyros. A consistent set of experiments repeatably showed 4 - 6 lbs. of weight loss." A variation of this device also described in this paper is called the "Linear Force Machine" and even a small model provided enough of a propulsion "force against space itself" or "space-drive" effect that he was able to propel himself across the floor on a wheeled cart or wagon. This device is diagrammed in that article and described, "The machine of figure (4) becomes a fundamental drive unit, capable of generating a thrust against "space" itself, and thus may replace all earlier methods of generating unidirectional motion, i.e. gears wheels transmission units for road travel, and propellers and jets for airborne vehicles." These "force machine" experiments are discussed further at http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity05/SecretOfForceMachine.html in the 29 April 1995 article "The Secret of the Force Machine" which includes Anti-gravitational Effects and Electrical Force Machines like the N-machine, explaining how "Space power is developed out of distortion of the normally isotropic space, the amount of distortion being represented by the reflected internally constrained forces explicitly developed in these machines" and showing diagrams of the force machine, Anti-Gravitational Force Machine, Sunburst N-Machine, fully compensated n-machine with twin contra-rotating magnetised rotors, etc. In one his experiments showing the properties of an "inertial field" created in the proximity of a rotating object, the frequency of a tuning fork in an accutron watch is changed by this field effect as demonstrated by a variation in the time shown on the watch. This experiment is discussed in Appendix 1 of the later writeup dated 18 June 1975 "Simple Experimental Test for the Inertial Field of a Rotating Real Mechanical Object" http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity09/NatureOfElectricalInduction.ht ml After these and other experiments including those showing increased inertia and momentum in the collisions of rotating vs non-rotating objects in the 1970's, and then a number of different configurations of n-Machine devices in the 1980's during which time some of the n-Machine experiments were replicated by Tewari and Inomata, by early in the 1990's DePalma finally got published a peer reviewed article on his work, "Magnetism as a Distortion of a Pre-Existent Primordial Energy Field and the Possibility of Extraction of Electrical Energy Directly from Space", Bruce de Palma; the proceedings of the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), August 4-9, 1992, Boston, Massachusetts; sponsored by The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). Among its references this paper cites the results of a 1986 independent testing of the original Sunburst n-Machine by then Stanford University EE Professor Emeritus W. Robert Kincheloe, "Kincheloe, Homopolar 'Free Energy' Generator Test, presented at 1986 meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A., 21 June 1986, revised 1 February 1987. Contains references to earlier DePalma papers re N-machine." http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity13/PreExistentPrimordialField.html About this time others began writing about integrating these ideas into an understanding of the "cold fusion" anomalies first reported in 1989 by Pons and Fleishmann, such as [1] http://depalma.pair.com/ColdFusion.html "Hypothesis of Homopolar Atomic Model for Cold Fusion Energy", by Emidio Laureti, whose abstract explains "By the means of a macroscopic structure, which reproduces homopolar induction, it is defined a form of interaction which might offer an hypothesis of atomic models, for a possible explanation of cold fusion energy", and [2] http://depalma.pair.com/discussions.html "NEW APPROACH TO COLD FUSION (LOW-TEMPERATURE NUCLEAR FUSION)" I. L. Cerlovin, R. Kh. Baranova, and P. S. Baranov (Translated from Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 230-232, January, 1992. Original article submitted December 15, 1991) 0022-1279/92/6201-0193, 1992 Plenum Publishing Corporation. "This is the first communication giving the results of a fundamentally new approach to low-temperature nuclear fusion, based on a new unified fundamental field theory, together with experimental corroboration of predictions of the theory and illustrations of possible practical uses of the results." After DePalma moved from Santa Barbara to Australia and then to New Zealand where he died in late 1997, some of the papers that he wrote reflect his continued re-evaluation of the implications of this "new knowledge". http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity09/NatureOfElectricalInduction.ht ml 28 July 1993 "On the Nature of Electrical Induction" begins with the quote "It is the conceptualizations which are important" (from A. S. Eddington in Fundamental Theory, 1944) and proffers "The phenomena of electrical induction which are fundamental to electrical science have long since passed into everyday experience. Recently the nature of this fundamental principle has been re-examined in the light of experiments with electrical machines, which, in their operation violate the conservation laws of charge and energy." Diagrams include (1) Toroidal Model of the universe (space orthagonal to time flow) correlating geometrically the direction of time flow with the movement in spacial dimensions (3 space), (2) Cross section diagram shows direction of time flow from future to past, (3) Interpretation of magnet showing direction of time energy flow through the magnet, (4) n-Machine or One-Piece Faraday Homopolar Generator. http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity10/ElectricalScienceWrong.html 16 July 1993 "Where Electrical Science Went Wrong" discusses Michael Faraday's performance of the initial experiments resulting in the discovery of the one-piece homopolar generator of December 26, 1831, in figure (1), diagram reproduced from Faraday's notebook. Also at that url is the paper of 4 January 1994, "On the Nature of Electricity" which includes diagram "Rotation of a magnetize gyroscope, the N-Machine" showing relationships between directions of magnetic polarity, rotation, and current flow. http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity04/FreeEnergyImplications.html DePalma's paper of 1993 "FREE ENERGY The Political, Social, and Economic Implications of The N- Machine / Space Power Generator" opens with the thought: It is said, "The whole Universe and created world is a thought in the mind of God", from The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, and then Bruce's counterpoise "If that be the case, wouldn't He want it to be the finest show in town?" By 1994 DePalma wrote about some deeper evaluations of Alternating Current in http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity12/ACInduction.html 20 September 1994 "Power Output of A.C. Induction Machines" which discusses "Slip of a.c. motors: The parameter of importance in this discussion is the a.c. motor slip frequency which is the difference between the unloaded motor speed, governed by the frequency in c.p.s. of the mains supply, and the speed at which the motor rotates under load. The torque of a polyphase motor varies almost directly as the magnitude of the rotor slip r.p.m." and explains "The Method of DePalma for characterisation of polyphase a.c. electromechanical energy converters consists of the measurement of rotor slip frequencies with sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal motor excitation and at constant motor loading." In his paper of 14 March 1995, "The Problem of Free Energy", he says http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity07/ProblemOfFreeEnergy.html "Some inventions are good inventions, others are bad inventions. We all know what the good inventions are, the bad ones are guns, atomic bombs, poison gases, germ warfare, etc. I am not advocating my machine or any other machine in particular to be 'the solution'. What is needed is a change of attitude. Our theories of Nature must take into account the transcendence of all things that exist, and the possibility of an energetic principle latent in Nature. With this we may survive." http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity06/ThatIsScience.html In his piece of 18 July 1995, "That is Science", he concludes that "The development of insight, and observational instincts to discriminate between the real and the unreal. That is Science." http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity01/NatureOfPrimordialField.html In the 27 February 1997 ON THE NATURE OF THE PRIMORDIAL FIELD: "For those of us who consider ourselves sophisticated we amuse ourselves with a pastime called Science. This the application of logic (the self-defining reasoning process in Nature), to Nature. This self-examination in itself has the limitation of the manifest in attempting to describe the un-manifest." http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity03/AbsurdityOfKnowledge.html >From 17 July 1996 The Absurdity of Knowledge: "The Absurdity of Knowledge relates to the fact that Knowledge is an interpretation of reality. What was known to be true at a certain time can be replaced with 'new' knowledge resulting in a different interpretation." http://depalma.pair.com/Absurdity/Absurdity02/ExperimentOfExistence.html >From 6 August 1996 The Experiment of Existence: "Is God an a priori condition for the existence of reality? What is prior before prior? The cosmic primordial field exists because it exists. I am because I am is the first statement of God. God is exploring the inner anatomy of himself. Dive deep into the sea of mind and find the gem of love." And in an article dated a few months before his passing, http://depalma.pair.com/Physics-woDePalma.html 27 July 1997 "Physics without DePalma" concludes, "Science without philosophy is as empty as philosophy without science. The best instrument for the exploration of this question is the human mind. I didn't make it this way, I found myself here. Awakening on the sandy beach of time, which pretty pebble shall I pick up." For more information on Bruce DePalma's work and legacy one may contact Andrew Mount , who was DePalma's assistant for the last decade of his life, is a trustee of DePalma Institute, and one who is continuing to archive DePalma's numerous papers on the "Primordial Energy" website http://www.depalma.pair.com whose introduction states "We designed this page to disseminate knowledge and accurate data relating to the Pre-Existent Primordial Field of the Universe - a sea of 'free energy' which permeates all. The N-1 Homopolar Generator -- invented by Bruce DePalma -- is an example of the type of device which is able to "plug in" to this Free Energy and eliminate the "need" for the continued use of fossil fuels and the consequent destruction of our only home - Earth. This device - and many others like it - have been proven to possess "over-unity" characteristics, ie: the power output is more than 100% of the input. It is our hope that in the near future Free Energy will enable mankind to progress from a state of dependence to one of abundance." Among the yet-to-be-posted papers in this site's listed bibliography is a letter from the US Deptartment of Energy, 9 May 1978, acknowledging their receipt of the N-Machine diagram. On page 57 of the US DOE Comprehensive National Energy Strategy of 1998 it mentions, in the section summarizing public comments, that "One commenter recommended that the DOE look into zero-point energy and mentioned a specific device for harnessing this energy source called the "N" machine. He challenged the Secretary of Energy to fully investigate this technology and let the American public know about it." http://www.hr.doe.gov/nesp/cnes.html David Crockett Williams gear2000@lightspeed.net http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000 8May99 (205th anniversary of Lavoisier execution) http://cti.itc.virginia.edu/~meg3c/classes/tcc313/200Rprojs/lavoisier2/home. html -- With kindest regards, Barry Carter Blue Mountain Native Forest Alliance WEB Page: http://www.triax.com/bmnfa/index.htm Phone: 541-523-3357