Why The Use Of A Nuclear Weapon,
Most Probably On A U.S. City,
Is Becoming
Likely
December Seventh
By Michael Donovan,
Camden, Maine
Dear
enemies,
A few days ago I sent the following
letter…:
Admiral Timothy
J. Keating
Commander
Northern
Command
northcompa@northcom.mil
Dear Admiral
Keating,
Rummy
is
nuts. Your upcoming nuclear 'exercise',
(response to a make-believe terrorist nuking), is now making the rounds
of the alternative Internet news.
I clicked to the Northern Command site from www.rense.com. Can't see
how it would not as the false-flags of 9/11 and London had many concurrent
military exercises.
Here is a joke that was going around Norfolk awhile back: Imagine
a big plate of spaghetti. You
know what military unit markers are on maps.
Imagine a whole shaker of
them. Sprinkle them all over
the spaghetti. Now you need some small arrows, curved and
straight. Get a shaker of these
and sprinkle them all over also.
What have you got? That's
General Montgomery's and General Patton's assault on Sicily reworked by Rummy's
Joint Forces Command.
Joint Forces Command has the real function of making the command structure
so complicated that at any given moment only a few insiders know what is
really going on. Therein an
army Lieutenant. could at some moment out-rank a naval Captain
etc. All in awe of those 'officers'
with some strange inside connections. And most of those officers who do seem 'connected' in
that way are so unprintably strange I pity those who must salute
them. Joint Forces Command,
by hidden and convoluted command structure itself, has been turned into an
SS sans jack boots. Look at
the colossal military mess with sea supply 'Van Riper'ly threatened and the
air supply through the Stans facing ten
divisions. Courtesy the 'bunker
boys' someplace underground near Tampa.
This leads, sir, to an obvious
question. While you are in Ft.
Monroe as commander of this 'make believe' nuking will you in fact be truly
and fully in command?
Sincerely,
Michael Donovan
Camden, Maine
I have lived through,
and been close to, two separate nuclear
threats. One was in 54 as a
child and the other in 1984.
Neither is well known.
There is an unmistakable energy, a ‘feel’, leading up to
these events. This dire energy
is emerging again. I reason
that unlike the other close-calls only wider, vastly wider, understanding
of the overall problem could defuse this.
The letter was posted
on a number of Internet sites. I see now that I need be far more
specific. The simple broadcast
of the exercise itself has irrevocably changed the entire nuclear landscape.
The underlying nuclear threat is not seen
correctly. It is not seen correctly
either by the masses or by the rulers who for six decades have held a very
different view of atomic bombs, a view never presented to the
masses. Nuclear threat dynamics
are changing more quickly than any sensible pragmatic reaction. Even with
a stand-down of this exercise, and a clear up-to-date dialogue concerning
how nuclear threats emerge, the known concept of the exercise alone will
be dangerously counter-productive.
It could blow up. And
if it does not blow up, it will still lead down that blow-back greased
slope. We are tending toward
a nuclear event one way or another.
This follow-up letter
is partially addressed to Admiral
Keating. He is
copied. For six decades the methods and arrangements for countering
nuclear threats have been kept not only from the public but all but the higher
echelons of intelligence as well.
In the years following the Japan nuking this problem was thought out
at the top and secret arrangements made.
In the interim the major governments, particularly nuclear powers,
have felt that the situation was under
control. In a nutshell
secret agreements were brokered by my Father’s boss, Henry
Luce. In the mid forties it
was reasoned that one nuclear power could not stop another from
nuking. Missiles were not needed, a simple yacht would
do. These agreements were made
first with Stalin then with the Chinese.
Luce made the agreement with the Chinese in
Iran. On his long return flight
to Rockefeller Center Luce was informed that the Chinese troops were crossing
the Yalu, knowing they would not be nuked. The public was sold another
story. In this deal amongst
the nuclear powers the worst no-no was to threaten a
nuke. The public was given the
impression it was happening all the
time. Real threats of that sort
were simply not allowed. No matter how much was wasted on building and testing
nukes it was somehow comforting during the Cold War to feel that august gentleman
in ‘intelligence’ had the situation under
control.
In those years Luce
made a pithy observation, “Wars
for unconditional surrender can no longer be
waged.” There were
many implications within this remark.
In practical terms it meant that we must make certain ‘playing
field’ agreements with most major governments as they were then in
place. The only way of making
such agreements was to guarantee enemy
sovereignty. As these
agreements were illegal the checking mechanism became overly powerful through
the last half century. In essence
the only way to make such a deal was for every party, every nuclear power,
to relate to the other parties both all serious ‘talk’ regarding
actually using a nuke and also exactly how the situation was being
handled. For example:
if some Russian general should start discussing a nuke in some Cold War situation
the higher aspects of Soviet intelligence would immediately relay that to
the other nuclear powers and detail how the situation was being
handled. This deal became the
inner political glue of the planet.
Slowly international criminal elements became involved in the checking
mechanism. This is why Colby,
prior to his murder, stated that the
“Criminal drug empires are now becoming more powerful than any state.”
Though citizenry might be
appalled, from a higher level it made
sense. An unseen wedge was drawn
between the rulers and the governed in both the East and the
West. Few knew the full
story. AT&T produced a film
on the Kennedy brothers. In
the film it had the president’s brother relaying a message to the Soviets
at their DC embassy during the Cuba fiasco that we would truly use
nukes. The accusation may have been true or only pretext to get
rid of Kennedy for other reasons.
The accusation itself is the
point. Like the unruly Russian
general in the example above the Americans showed how they would handle such
a situation. It was the importance
of the issue that had all of media go along with the
cover-up. On that level, (if
in fact the charges true), the actions more than made
sense. The killings were absolutely
necessary.
Great effort was
made to obscure the true nuclear situation from the
public. This effort worked quite
well. Wherein even a child could
reason that missiles are not needed to nuke a country ‘missile
shields’ were
envisioned. Lyndon
LaRouche became a loose cannon when he proposed the ‘Star Wars’
concept. Bright as he is, he
too was part of the misinformed public believing the nuclear aspects of the
Cold War on the “mass” not “ruler”,
level. Lyndon LaRouche believed
there was a true need for missile defense. It was the Star Wars suggestion
that had Senator Moynihan write the piece in the NYTimes which led to his
imprisonment. But the cat had
a paw out of the bag. It was
Reagan who simply suggested that we go ahead and do it
anyway. Silly as the concept was the public largely went
along.
The true triggers
for nuclear attacks are not held in some
computers. They are held in
the only place they can be…;
in people. A nuclear
attack only comes about with a degree of
consensus. Over the years a
large amount of disinformation was placed before the public regarding the
building of bombs. Once you
have the material they are easy to make.
There has even been an Internet rumor fostered over the past ten years
or so hinting that nuclear devices only go off in certain
locations. Granted there are
grids of subtle energy around the earth and these may effect devices, but
only marginally. As long as
the public at large believed that nuclear devices were hard to come by, hard
to make and only in the hands of major powers the secret non-use-of-nuke
deals made sense. Not that it
made sense to the public, they were simply being ripped
off. But it did make sense to
the elite who were making, holding, and testing the
weapons. But to give credit
due, no matter how much a rip off it was to the world population, the fact
is that we have not used nukes since 1945.
Admiral Keating’s
exercise will now change the tricky
formula. It suddenly indicates
to the consensus forming public, on both the mass and ruler level, the truth
that nukes are easy to come by.
And Admiral Keating’s exercise demonstrates to a consensus forming
world public that nuke threats from anywhere must be taken
seriously. A few weeks
ago they emptied a local high school because of a bomb
threat. What would it take to
empty, if one were to say, …and I am not saying…, the Twin
Cities? Who determines a safe
distance in miles? What portion could be evacuated
upwind?
Safire coined the
term “geopolitical
stratosphere”. Unknown
to almost all of his readers he was referring to the nuclear issue on this
level. This thinking is hard
to hold in one’s mind. The
lies concerning the nuclear issue are so colossal that they are
magnetic. There were many in
surprisingly high levels who did not understand what I am telling
you. One was Barry Goldwater,
a wonderful man. When the media decapitated him with “Would you
trust” there were many levels to that
statement. Most of the barriers
in this thinking are emotional.
How do you react to the Kennedy
killings? A deal is a deal and the nuclear the most serious of
issues. Anyone reading this
letter would, (if AT&T correct), have also ordered those killings were
they in that position at that time holding that
responsibility. Anyone reading
this letter and denying that simply does not have the humility to place
themselves fully in those shoes.
Because this
‘higher’ august thinking is hard to hold the wiser leaders would
have men around who could hold these
views. Carter placed Hedley
Donovan on his Cabinet with the position of just sitting there and holding
“the big picture”.
As it is amazing how far up some people can be and still not be clued
to the things I am saying here, it is also similarly amazing how far up a
person can quickly go by understanding these tricky formulas early in
career. Kissinger was knowingly
writing bull about the nuclear issue while still in
Harvard.
Why has the present
administration made such a colossal nuclear
error? It is because this type
of thinking is hard to hold and because they quickly became so insular, making
one mistake after another, until events have overtaken most any possibility
of planned direction.
The proper date
to concentrate on now is not August 6th and 9th but
December 7th. History
fairly much tells us that we let our guard down to create Pearl Harbor as
an issue the public could rally around.
It was not a false flag but more a
tactic. From the ‘ruler
perspective’ this made sense. However for Pearl Harbor to go down there had to be consensus
between two parties. We had
to let our guard down, but also Japan had to
attack. Perhaps that seems overly
obvious. It is
not. Admiral Keating et al,
in overlooking that obvious trivia, has unwittingly unleashed a slope to
a nuking in almost all scenarios.
There is now much
evidence that 9/11 was a false flag. If or not it was a false flag makes not one wit of difference
as it now relates to the now empowered slope toward a
nuking. Because a portion
of the public believes there have been recent false flags they would tend
to believe that Admiral Keating’s nuke exercise could be a cover for
a false flag as well. It may
or may not be, but in either case Keating’s exercise itself has still
pushed the world over that slope.
Keating et al were reacting to shrill, unwise, attention-getting bleats
from Congress. They simply did not think this
through. Though the coming exercise may not turn out to be a false
flag, and though many still believe the 9/11 Commission, the concept in the
public mind of the possibility of false flag is still one major
factor. (As a
footnote: There would be no need for concurrent military operations
during a false flag nuking. It
is far more simple, would take a long time to even construct the renters
that were at ground zero, almost zero evidence left.)
The secret agreements
brokered by Henry Luce in the late forties and very early fifties made
sense. At first blush one might
ask why open agreements to make nukes illegal were not
made. After all following World
War I mustard gas was made illegal by international agreement and this agreement
held throughout World War II. One
could be cynical and point out that one major reason for curtailing gas use
in war was to save war itself.
Mustard gas was never used in one entire theatre of World War I,
Galipoli. The effects of mustard
gas were so awful that the men on both sides, Mustafa Kamel’s and Lord
Kitchner’s, let it be known that if it was used they would start killing
officers. Mustard gas could
be manufactured by most any nation or even rogue
group. The effects on troops
were just too horrid. Outlawing
made sense. Atomic bombs could
also be manufactured with a little more
effort. However, the
technology then new, the untrue idea could be placed in the public mind that
they were very difficult to make.
Were you in Luce’s shoes you would see clearly that only a deal
that would benefit the bankers would
fly.
One may argue Secretary
Stimson’s possible rational for using the bombs on
Japan. At the time there was
also a faction that just wanted them demonstrated to the
Japanese. Most astute observers
see that the bombings were more a threat to the emerging communist block
than ending the war with Japan.
Stimpson may have been thinking even beyond that, (most likely was),
envisioning that after such an attack deals would need be made and how those
deals could be used for world control.
He may have reasoned that had an awful attack not been made, merely
demonstrated, the required urgency would not be in place to secure the deals
that would otherwise tend to go more like mustard
gas. At any case deals were
made in the following years however far ahead he was
looking. It must be pointed out that the arrangers of the Manhattan
Project knew that the other major powers quickly and easily could produce
bombs themselves. In fact China
and the Soviet Union could have done so far more quickly than they did, USSR
in 1949, China in the early sixties.
By which I mean, for example, that the seeming early
production, the Soviets in 49, could have been even earlier, far earlier,
were they just to produce a simple
A-bomb. The holding off was
in some very small part to create a bomb with all safety factors in
manufacturing, but apart from that almost wholly
political. The communist block
could ‘hold a moral edge’ by dragging their
feet. But nuclear weapons were
simply too awful, some sort of deal had to be
made. And a deal is a deal.
Their best position was to make
the deal, (they had to) but drag on it, (posture
reluctant). At present both China and Russia move back and forth on
expanding the club, Russia with Iran and China with North Korea, always slight
leveraging without ever coming to close to breaking the absolutely necessary
deal itself.
Henry Luce was the
obvious broker. First, no such
deals could be made without the entire cooperation of the
media. It was mainly the media
that had to hold the truth and tell the
lie. Raised in China Luce had
all the proper connections and a superior world
view. Secondly, (and far less
obvious), the deals could not be made by a government subject to the winds
of politics, but only to august men who pulled both the economic and media
strings and could guarantee control.
In fact some point after Luce went to Stalin that became an
issue. In a paraphrased nutshell
Uncle Joe said, “I love it, I
love it, but I can’t go for it.
You know I am in charge here.
But we never know who is in charge there from president to
president.”
Joe’s objection
made sense. Luce’s only
option was to demonstrate the required control, mere stating it would not
do. This deal did not seal in one
move. There was play back and forth until the required trust
was developed. Joe’s objection
was not at the onset, not until early in the Eisenhower
administration. Luce and Hedley
Donovan countered with a phony censorship flap.
Hedley Donovan is
the role model for Doonsbury’s ‘Hedley Roland’, the CIA type
posing as a newsman. A Rhodes
scholar he was considered the best in naval intelligence in WW
II. In higher circles he was best known for a brilliant plan
to locate the Japanese which led to the battle of Leyte
Gulf. We had to know where they
were in a hurry and Donovan had a
brainstorm. He put out an order
for all our spies on every island to go down to the local bar or watering
hole and report only one thing, was the talk ‘serious’ or
‘happy’. Each spy
had to make a decision, one or the
other. With just that
he plotted location. Also on
an upper level the song ‘Happy Talk’ was placed in South Pacific
as an insider tribute. Luce made Hedley president of Time
Magazine. Those who can follow this logic will see how necessary
it was, and is, to have major media controlled for such a
deal. A fairly public flap was
created to demonstrate to Uncle Joe that the media/bankers, not the
administration, were in control of the nuclear
arms. Chosen to broadcast this
flap was not Time but the more upscale Fortune
magazine. Fortune printed a
story with the phrase “…the
president
decided….” A
great flap was created going back and forth between Time Inc. and the White
House, very public in Fortune, until a ‘retraction’ was made and
the phrase changed to “…it was
decided….” The
issue as to what was being decided did not
matter. Using Fortune was public enough to adequately demonstrate
that 1- the upscale public would not raise serious objection and 2- the
“White House”
concurred. This is all
well documented in Elsner’s History of Time Inc., Vol.
II. Though Elsner goes over
the ‘flap’ in some detail, never is it stated (odd only when pointed
out) what the flap was really about.
Luce had already
brought the Chinese into the secret
deal. This too can be reasoned in
retrospect. Luce conferred with the Chinese in Tehran, Iran, again
well-documented in Elsner’s.
While Luce was on the thirty hour flight back to Rockefeller Center
the Chinese troops crossed the Yalu and entered
Korea. One can reason that they
knew they would not be nuked.
In order to maintain
this deal there had to be maintained an interlocking between the higher aspects
of government, the higher aspects of media and the higher aspects of the
military both West and East. This
deal could not be continued if too many in either area knew the full
story. Though a child could
reason that missiles were simply not necessary great emphasis would be placed
on missiles in the public mind.
Ongoing nuclear negotiations were constructed to continually
fail. There would be lower (really
fairly high!) voices in the military objecting, they would see ‘missile
shields’ as making little sense.
As long as the media did not give voice to these officers the common
sense objections would fade even before they were
heard. The media, as always
feigning to be liberal, would also pen a level of objection with occasional
op ed to shunt off disgruntled energy onto other areas such as “nuclear
non-proliferation” which more continued and uplifted the secret
agreements.
Over the past six
decades public awareness of the nuclear issue has
waned. Only the baby boomer
generation can remember the Life photos of dummy houses engulfed in fire
in hydrogen bomb tests, fallout shelters, civil defense drills and ‘duck
and cover’ exercises in schools.
To a great extent the public became
numb. As we had to work on higher
levels with the other powers there would always be objections, war to war,
as lower levels of intelligence began to see
this. Legend are the stories of ‘working with the other
side’ in regard to both Korea and
Nam. A tricky balance had to
be played by major media to give those objections just enough exposure to
continue the public perception of the media charging at government like some
white knight, but never enough to bring the full realization into the public
mind.
How can such a colossal
secret deal be made to work decade after
decade? How does one side know
that the other side is not
‘cheating’? How can
such necessary honor be maintained among
thieves? For one thing there
need be, from time to time, ‘nuclear alarms’ set off to see how
various people high in the military and media and government would react
in both the East and the West.
Again, there was a very sharp pyramid of
knowledge. The aura of nuclear
confrontation had to be maintained.
On that level MAD made perfect
sense. War could not simply
break out by accident. That
would be far too dangerous.
Therefore the public mind was fed stories such as Hunt For Red
October. Or more correctly those types of authors
promoted. At one level there
was always a ‘game of cat and mouse’ between the navies at
sea. At a higher level, as it
needed to be, the games were only allowed in certain restricted
playpens.
In most normal small
towns the local police have developed quid pro quo arrangements with semi
criminal elements. This is done
particularly with victimless crime, drugs and
prostitution. This is just smart,
prudent police work:
“We will leave you alone
as long as you provide us information regarding serious
crime.” Reasonably a police chief who shies away from such tactics
is placing the public more in danger of real
crime. Say you have two neighboring towns at war each with an
unacceptably powerful weapon that they want to secretly agree not to
use. Would not the use of this
sort of intelligence shared by both sides, an intermediary, be sensible in
keeping the deal honest? Such
is the position that we, (this ‘we’ being the higher aspects of
the Cold War both East and West), placed
Israel.
Israel was forming,
1947, at the same time that deals had to be
made. Because of the Great
Dispersion the Jewish population already had in place a worldwide economic
network. They became the perfect
go-betweens. If you have any
doubt of this look at the back of the Mossad expose, By Way Of
Deception. There you will see a ‘map’ of the various Mossad
desks. Notice that on, say a
scale of 1 to 10, the size of the Africa Desk or the Europe Desk is about
a five. Notice that the
biggest desk, a 10, is for the small Benelux
countries. Then notice that
there were (are) NO desks for either the United States or Soviet
Union/Russia. Reason that on
higher levels the Mossad was really a very necessary creation of, a stepchild
of, a ‘combined’ KBG and CIA.
Many on the alternative news sites piss and moan about Israeli companies
controlling such sensitive areas in the United States such as all the phone
billing. Have the maturity to
understand, given the power of atomic weapons that these sorts of operations
for creating trust were and are absolutely
necessary. In order to maintain
the Mossad a certain level of armed tension had to be maintained in the Middle
East between Israel and surrounding
states. Only then would the
uninformed Israeli population have the militarism to maintain high levels
and funds for intelligence. Over
the years this tension was creatively controlled: never letting it get too
out of hand and at the same time never letting it go too far toward
peace. If any reading this piss
and moan about that please have the maturity to see that those orchestrating
this were balancing a bombing now and then (loss of some life) with trust
and control of nuclear weapons (unacceptable loss of
life). In the real world august
men had to maintain this sort of controlled conflict year after
year. There was simply no other
reasonable choice.
(
…
The ‘controlled’ level of Israeli /
Palestinian conflict is most likely hard for some to
swallow. Do a search on the Internet for ,<”Kay
Griggs”>. Kay’s,
now Kaytherine Pollard Miller, first marriage was to the grandson of the
former governor of Virginia. Her
family is “Old Virginia Military”, even has Chesty Puller as a
cousin. Kay then married Colonel
George Griggs, the head assassin trainer at Little
Creek. Griggs was Cap and Gown
and Rummy’s close friend at
Princeton. Some of the more
important facts are lost in the many hours of video from this ‘former
senior NATO wife’, now downloaded all over the
Internet. First, that she clearly relates that her husband continually
insisted that he worked for an international group, that his position in
the Marine Corps was only a convenience and a
cover. In fact he said that
he was told early in his career never to expect to make general, that for
his duties that rank would be too high
profile. With the amount of
such activity hidden cleverly in the US Marines, (who would dare insult?),
it is wise to beware of Marine colonels acting in a general’s capacity,
the Bud McFarlanes and Olli Norths.
Secondly that he gave her great detail of the manner in which we play
both sides of the Israeli / Palestinian conflict keeping it at a very controlled
bloody level. In perspective
one might defend her husband.
Someone had to do the real dirty
work. One must keep in mind
that awful actions had to be taken to stem off a far larger
threat. Kay (Griggs) Miller
also details, most notably by homosexuality in the higher Marine Corps ranks,
the axiom bantered in the higher ranks that “If you f—k up you
move up” Through the ascent of the neocons, as much as possible,
only officers that could be compromised would be
advanced. This should be considered in the present case of General
Byrnes. This type of promoting
also led to a dearth of field grade at the onset of
Iraq. Though field grade and flag officers, in the words of
the Virginian Pilot, are ‘as common as jackrabbits’, there were
few who could hold the required ‘command confidence’ in
combat. This was the situation
that led to the sudden reactivation of retired Marine Corps officers such
as General O’Dell. They
suddenly needed real
‘generals’….)
With this there
is also pissing and moaning about the level of drug corruption involved within
the major governments. A search
of <”Katherine Austin Fitts”> would help many understand
the extent. True using criminal
elements as a ‘deal check’ has created major worldwide
corruption. But please take
just a moment to look at this from another
perspective. Trust was the major
issue, trust between nations with unacceptably awful weapons and populations,
even at fairly high levels, locked into a seriously adversarial
stance. The use, collectively
at higher levels, of the drug trade was no more than the local police
chief’s wise and judicious use of information from a local pot
dealer. The higher levels of intelligence had to use the situation
as it was given. They were not
the ones who outlawed such drugs.
They were also not the ones who created the huge
markets. In the beginning every
effort was made to keep the quid pro quo aspect of world illicit drug trade
at a high level letting ‘normal’ state policing operate with great
leeway. Granted that became
hard to maintain and has largely fallen
apart. It has combined into a nearly seamless illegal world
system. However, as awful as
this sounds, and as awful in some respects as it is, do balance this against
the nuclear threat. Understand
that those having to control this threat had at all times to place the terrible
nuclear threat first. That we
have gone through six full decades without an atomic bomb being used in war
is a major accomplishment.
The new atomic
landscape, a far more dangerous one created by Admiral Keating, has been
created by simply eroding the protective lies that have been in
place. The lies were
colossal. Atomic bombs are easy
to make. Early on we publicly
fried spies with bulging eyes and sizzling flesh not at all because they
gave away secrets, but almost wholly to impress upon the public that there
were some important nuclear secrets to give
out. Truth is that there were
not. Once Hiroshima and Nagasaki
occurred, and with the theory published forty years prior to that event,
suggesting that the Soviets really needed any help is outright
insulting. In the early fifties
a project was created that on the surface seemed the greatest stupidity
imaginable. This was a project
that again even a mere child could reason to be
insane. We decided to place nuclear reactors in
warships. A nuclear reactor
always has the danger of melting down, or in some violent circumstances,
(improbable but possible), could
even become a bomb. Is not placing
a reactor in a warship placing it in probable violent
circumstances? Not to the higher
thinking. Not when you look
past the lie. It was reasoned
that only major powers would have the ability to attack American
warships. And with these powers
we had secret deals, we would play at warring and control the rest of the
world. And the rest of the world,
the Third World, simply did not have the capacity to attack our larger surface
warships. That has drastically
changed. Technology has turned
on itself and now Third World powers do have the ability to attack and sink
large naval vessels. This first
started to be realized with the sinking of the
H.M.S Sheffield in the Falkland
War. More recently U.S. war
games, prior to the invasion of Iraq, clearly demonstrated that the technology
for taking out warships from the seabed was far outstripping any possible
defense and that this technology was well within the ability of both Third
World nations and even creative rogue
groups. In retrospect the attack on the Cole was not near what
it could have been. Those wanting
more information can search for <”General Van
Riper”>. Though not
realized yet by the general masses this is now a worldwide collective military
realization. It is generally
understood that the United States is using “weapons of mass
destruction” as a shield.
When Third World powers did not have this ability the question was
moot. Now the inability to attack
back at a warship that is attacking a nation because an attack could cause
a major environmental disaster is viewed very
differently.
Who would use or
threaten a United States city with an atomic
device? The Cold War, as above,
did create a very effective global intelligence network understood only at
the very top. There are vast
intelligence networks throughout the Third
World. The realization that
at the top both East and West were sharing information is now seeping into
the collective consciousness. Some
nations that might be considered ‘rogue’, or even wrongly labeled
as such, are wisely staying away from nuclear
endeavors. I am thinking of
nations such as Libya. Those
nations who are publicly going toward nuclear capability in opposition to
the ‘security council club’ such as North Korea or Iran are doing
so with the realization that they need fully accept the ‘club’
responsibility. I believe you
can count these out. As there
are still major ‘Cold War’ aspects in place of working all
‘terrorist groups’ you could count out known terrorist groups as
well. The party or parties who
would take this road of attack would most likely be
spontaneous. This spontaneity
would be more in the vein of Ethan Allen’s Green Mountain
Boys. The Green Mountain Boys
who attacked the British in the American War of Independence later met in
a barn and discussed how rash their actions were, that they would most likely
be prosecuted for treason. At
that time, just following their initial attack, they had no idea that a full
revolution was afoot. They were
reacting spontaneously and independently to the military zeitgeist of the
times. It was a natural military reaction to a change in
consciousness. As for a nuking
group the endeavor would most likely be very closely
held. In effect America has
declared war on most of the Third World.
A nuking would most likely come from Africa or even South
America.
What would the project
entail?
There is at present
much focus on the Valerie Plame case. The judge, a well-respected jurist,
has blacked out many pages of testimony and will keep that testimony
sealed. A core aspect of the
case revolves around the validity of a
‘paper trail’ of “yellow cake” which is partially
processed uranium. What can
be reasoned to have been blacked out is that the situation only revolves
around ‘paper trails’ of known sources of enriched uranium
and known paper trails. If
or not ‘rogue’ aspects of the Third Word are reasoning what is
being blacked-out in this specific case does not
matter. It is being reasoned
anyway. Assuredly the sentences
blacked-out by The Honorable Thomas Hogan start with
“However…”, and
“You must also
realize…”, and
“Understand this refers
only…”. In
the early fifties there was a prudent desire to control and even mine all
the world’s uranium. On
upper levels it was a small part of the reasoning to make many atomic
weapons. It was soon quietly
realized as undoable. Once uranium was becoming a commodity this led to a vast
amounts of discoveries in many places.
The types of mining procedures
vary. Often it is a by-product
of other mining though now and then fairly pure veins are
discovered. As with all such
discoveries the information is closely held until deals are
signed. When thinking of uranium
mines the areas that first come to mind are Australia, Canada and South
Africa. Truth is it can be mined
almost anywhere, Utah, Niger, Nigeria, and Brazil are areas where there are
ignored discoveries all over. You
might even ignore the word ‘mine’ and see that it can be a by-product
of, or combined with, anything from irrigation to road
construction. The processing
procedures are not at all rocket science either and facilities can also be
in conjunction with, or disguised as, about
anything. One cannot even know
of every ‘aspirin’ factory, no less bomb them
all. Ninety nine percent of
the time the basic tool used in obtaining the substance is the common pneumatic
jackhammer.
In such an operation
what form would the uranium be placed in?
Most probably the
best transportation form would not be yellow cake but pure pellets sealed
in lead for later combining. These
can be hidden in anything from liquid containers, the casings then in Styrofoam
so they don’t make noise banging around, to the insides of Buddha or
Quan Yin figurines delivered mistakenly to Wiccan Supplies, Show River Centre,
St. Paul. How lucky they were
that the prayerful Amed kept coming in and asking for
such. He bought them all.
All this far more simple than a Mathius Rust going under the real
radar, quite doable also.
Once the material is sent near the location to be bombed, discounting
at least one person becoming very ill, the assembly itself is a snap. Any
near rented location for assembly would
do. Unlike other bombs no further
delivery problems, rental vans and such, would be
needed. How far from Munson
Avenue need you be? Imperial
powers have continually underestimated the
enemy. The British considered
the American rebels inept, they didn’t even have
cannon. They were sorely surprised
when Washington’s General Henry Knox made the unusual move of dragging
80 cannon all the way through the snow from Upstate New York with 200 oxen
to blast them to hell.
9/11 has created a split in the official line regarding the ease of
making simple nukes. On one
hand the old lie is touted, the line is that nukes are very difficult to
make. On the other hand they
are talking about ‘suitcase’
nukes. An atomic bomb the size
of a suitcase might be technically difficult wherein one in a twenty foot
aluminum tube not difficult at all.
“The new neighbor, Amed, certainly seems
nice. At least someone in Roseville
barbecues lamb instead of always chicken and
steak. I just don’t understand
his sculptures.”
One bomb, called
the Tube, used on Japan was just that.
The right amount of uranium on each end of the tube smashed together
with charges. The other was
called the Fat Boy. This was
big and round, the charges coming in from many
directions. The 3-D Fat Boy
would be mechanically harder, but sixty degree angles are easy to work
with. This could be flattened
to charges coming from six directions in the manner of a
‘SNOWFLAKE’.
Would threat or
prior warning be delivered?
Who
knows? A viable threat itself
need only consist of enough information to make the receivers reasonably
certain that the engineering is
workable. With such a threat
need there be a component of
extortion? “We will set
this off if you do not…,” do such and
such? Not
necessarily. Rummy et al have
almost made that component grossly
obvious. Nor could you necessarily
trust that aspect of the threat anyway.
The threatening party might be throwing you off or even designing
it to look like a false flag, blaming the United States for what it has already
done. Do place yourself in the
position of an official receiving a viable
threat. Last week the police
chief had emptied a local high school because of a phoned in bomb
threat. Do you ignore this as “not giving into
terrorists”? Though Nagasaki
a secondary target, decided at last minute because of weather, Stimson was
thoughtful enough not to bomb giant
cities. There were two bombs
to make clear this could be repeated.
The list of possible Japanese nuke targets were not bombed by conventional
bombs so we could study the real effect.
For the exact same reason a smaller city would most likely be
chosen. Or between two small
cities to make the point clear.
One would hope an adversary would give warning.
There are two parts
to military intelligence, capability and
intent. Capability of delivering
a nuke to an American city has been leaking steadily out, the concept
thoughtlessly punctuated by Admiral
Keating. The justification,
the intent, for such an act is rapidly being
created. American depleted uranium
in ordnance is giving civilian populations in Iraq, including babies born
and yet unborn, the equivalent of two chest X-rays per
day. Bombs are being dropped
from aircraft based on ships that are partially shielded from attack as it
would be an environmental nightmare.
Even ‘just as shield’ it is the use of a
WMD. All this is done while
the world sees the pretext for war, weapons of mass production, a
lie. This anger has spread to
vast areas of Africa and South America.
From the recent coup in Mauritania (rich in uranium) to the recent
posture of Venezuela, also ore rich, the Third World with or without state
sanction is turning against us.
Most of our allies are also turning to one degree or
another.
December
7th, rather than the anniversaries of the Japan nukings, is the
date to let us see how consensus is
formed. In that situation it
could be likened to two big thugs walking toward each other with warlike
intentions. Each had a group
of followers behind them. In order to get his followers in a fighting mood one thug
surreptitiously lets his guard down so a group of his men get
blooded. The men behind each
thug were only minor parts of the
consensus. Most would normally
not want to sit in malaria swamps and get shot
at. But the consensus was enough
to war. The attack would have
come guard down or not. The
Cold War could then be likened to two groups of major thugs with many other
minor thugs around them being forced to take
sides. As each of the major
thugs had an unacceptably dangerous weapon a secret agreement was made (only
between the weapon holders) not to use
it. This also had the advantage of fooling many of the surrounding
minor thugs into thinking that they could bond with and trust one side or
another. Few realized much was
shared at top. Though a tricky
balance had to be maintained in feigning more antagonism that was really
there, the tricky balance, mainly with media image, was somehow
maintained. This balance was
maintained with lies. Not only
were the masses lied to but such a secret and illegal agreement would naturally
have problems occur from time to time, as they did, in the course of six
decades. Most, even those who think they are very much in the know
and in the upper echelons of society and intelligence, can’t see the
bigger picture. Let us use the
Israeli attack upon the USS Liberty,
an American naval vessel more than twenty years
ago. I know Jose Linde whose
brother was the naval intelligence officer aboard and killed in the
attack. Jose’s father also
worked with my father at Time. It
is known that a nearby carrier group refused to assist the
Liberty during the course of the
attack. There are strong feelings
from many of the survivors and the
families. I drove to the Army/Navy
Club in DC to hear Admiral Moore speak on the
subject. On the whole most all
played the game of
“…ain’t it
awful.”
These ‘educated
and concerned’ citizens would never venture out into the possibility
that there was good cause for an attack on our
ship. To them there could not
have been any justification for either the attack or the
cover-up. Their minds simply
could not go there, even in reasoned
theory. To them any justification
was truly beyond their imagination. They stayed in ‘ain’t it awful’
games. I have not a clue why the Liberty was
attacked. But I did understand,
unlike most around me hearing the former Armed Forces Chief of Staff, that
there was some reason. On a
higher level some breach of agreement was acknowledged and punishment
accepted. With this I could
also see the ruler dilemma. What
choice would they have, given the popular uneducated atmosphere, but to fog
the situation by accepting the attack as an ‘accident’ even though
it would not be believed?
A secret deal of this sort will from time to time produce high level
problems that even most in intelligence will not correctly
see. The morning of the christening
of America’s newest carrier, The USS Ronald Reagan, there was an
unadvertised but open-to-public speakers meeting in Hampton. The audience
was composed mainly of retired CIA types who didn’t want to play golf
that day. Speaking were Edwin Meese, Jean Kirkpatrick and John
Lehman. Each one of these speakers
referred to ‘Chernenko’s warnings in 1983’ as the great turning
point in modern history. The
general public does not hold that view.
This was way over the head of many in intelligence as well. Chernenko
followed through with his warnings on March 15th,
1984. “Without warning”
he deployed four battle groups. He
deliberately acted specifically against lower levels of secret
agreements. A few months later
it was announced on the front page of the NYTimes, (A Drew Middleton, Times
analyst article), that John Lehman had attempted to give standing orders
to Atlantic battle group commanders that nukes would be used if the Soviets
again staged ‘maneuvers without
warning’. No comment was ever
published. It was a
blip. Few asked the obvious
question, ‘why should warning be
given?’ Don’t the navies play cat and mouse at
sea?
No. Chernenko’s
threat and following actions were at the highest
level. Unlike other ‘nuke
showdowns’ or brinkmanship that were for show, this was for real at
the highest level. And it was
the highest levels that were freaking out at the
time. Is not Freedom Of The
Seas one of Wilson’s 14 points?
I would guess not if that was published in that
manner.
Chernenko’s ‘demonstration’ was March 15th,
1984. Twelve years later, 1996,
was when the tricky formula first started to really
unravel. The shootdown of flight
800 was a necessary payback when the United States got caught cheating on
the necessary secret nuke deal.
The ‘cheating’ itself at first blush was history, it went
back a full 42 years to 1954. In
April of 54 we came close to using two atomic bombs to help the French in
Dien Bien Phu. Apparently we
did not share all the ‘serious talk’ as per the
agreement. Let us say that nuclear
weapons are held between three thugs or drug
lords. Again the ONLY thing
keeping the deal ‘honest between thieves’ is to share ALL serious
talk. Though I did not know
the full implications, it was I who brought this subject up out of the past,
first to John Griffin, head of the US Attorney’s Criminal Division,
Boston, around Christmas 1995.
Shortly following this, two months or so, a fuller explanation of
this ‘cheating’ went to General Charles Krulac, Commandant of the
US Marine Corps. I found a creative
method for insuring that the information would get directly to Krulac bypassing
Naval Intelligence, FBI, etc. And
his office found a way of indicating that the material was
received. There was commotion
on high: First the murder of
William Colby (April 27th, 96), seventeen days after that the
murder of Admiral Jeremy Boorda ( May 16th), and 33 days after
that the shootdown of flight 800, (July
17th).
Krulac would have had to tell
Boorda. Within the inner circles
of the drug/media/government? secret, deal-holding complex the history of
my parents was probably known.
Known but apparently not fully
shared. And they assumed I knew
and this was the fuller reason for an ongoing program to both discredit and
disable me.
Let me back track a few years to return to the
staccato punctuation of Colby, Boorda, Flight 800:
At one point Colonel Frank Trobucco, head of the
Mass State Police, trying to help me, was warning me to steer clear of anyone
trying to get between myself and Charles Barry then head of the Mass Office
of Public Safety. All
communication was interrupted and 86ed by a former FBI agent, Dennis Condon,
then Barry’s ‘chief of
staff’. I only recently
understood after reading Black Mass, the book by two Boston Globe reporters,
Lehr and O’Neal, detailing the illegal relationship between Whitey Bulger,
‘Rifleman’ Flemmi, Gennaro Angiulo, Frank Salemme and the
FBI. There was a pack of dirty FBI agents working directly
with the Boston mob. One, John
Connoly, was tried and convicted.
Lehr and O’Neal maintain that Dennis Condon was the FBI agent
everyone knew was dirty but got away.
(Am aware my list is longer than Lehr and O’Neal’s!.) During
that time (late 80s) there was even heavy mob extortion, death threats to
shut me up. This occurred on
Martha’s Vineyard. These
wise-fellows felt very protected giving me the
threat. Not only did they make
it known, (and it was true), that I could not go to the police on this, but
they even conjectured right in front of my face that this ‘favor’
would get the RICO against Anquilo somehow thrown
out! It didn’t, Anquilo
later convicted anyway. All to say that extraordinary measures were taken
to shut me up. (I must also
interject that I was also involved in another sensitive more
‘scientific’ issue and for a long period could not really sort
out exactly why, or for which, I was taking the
heat.) It was also during
this time that I was threatened with federal
prosecution. In this they were talking Marion, Ill, the worst of our
federal prisons. This did not
come from the U.S. Attorney. It
came through the mob. And it
was given with a good deal of information that rightly only the government
should have known. They made
it real enough. I came
apart.
(…From that time I
also understood that there is much I simply cannot
say. When Marion, Ill was mentioned
I saw the threat. For what could
I be prosecuted? The MaCarthy
Act? No person has ever been charged under the statute, though
for a time there was talk of getting Jesse Jackson with
it. Then it dawns on me.
I was set up. Far more
serious. One of the reasons
that Lehr and O'Neal gave about Condon to indicate that he was dirty was
that he pleaded the Fifth more than any mob
figure. But now
I am in that
position. Now I understand the
real meaning for the Fifth and my feeling is that it should read,
“…not be forced to ‘wrongly’ testify..” against
oneself. Of course that wording
would not work, the truth is the truth. But with gut wrenching fear I understood the set-up and
the real need for that right. I
am one of the two witnesses required by law and, particularly with this
administration, won’t go anywhere near an entire
area. I would take the Fifth.
Period….)
In September of 93, not knowing the full implications, I distributed
a piece called Wrench. Directly
following that, October, there was a rash of fires all on one night on Cape
Cod. The very next morning,
with the fires not even listed as arson yet- just suspicious fires, the BATF
was all over investigating them with a headline in the Dow Jones owned Cape
Cod Times suggesting
“terrorism”. One fire
was almost on the steps of the Falmouth
Enterprise. In retrospect I saw that Wrench placed the publisher of
a local paper knowing too much about steganography, messages hidden in news,
and an arm needed to be placed on him.
A bit of terrorism would come in handy for that. By chance parents
of a young man called the police as he was whacked out on booze and
coke. The young man admits that he and his friends were trying
to create the appearance of terrorism.
His words in the police report.
This is ignored by the Cape Cod
Times. How did they know only
hours after? Were they
psychic? Why was the BATF about
just hours after suspicious fires?
Just following this two young coke dealers are found murdered on the
porch of a deserted hotel in Bourne.
The police call it murder.
The FBI comes in, calls it a double
suicide. All records are sealed,
even autopsies. Most likely
they supplied the coke and were a link between the fire-starters and the
government. (There was far more
evidence to suggest this was the case, and that the underlying issue was
what a publisher knew.) This
left me for quite a time, again was 93, completely
confused. I could see my knowledge
the issue. What I could not
understand is why they went to all this elaborate trouble, even taking life,
when it would have been far simpler to kill
me. In fact I was thinking they
would, they would have to. My
own story did not make sense.
It was somewhere felt that I had too big a nose. I have had two successful newspapers shut down, one that went for five years on the Vineyard, the other a start-up comeback that would have taken off had the local illicit drug dealers had not extorted my ad base. I had two who were willing to testify and neither the DA nor the U.S. Attorney’s office would step in. This was followed by a trumped up civil suit. I was at wits end, now end of 95, and again was corresponding with Criminal Division, Boston. In one letter I lightly mentioned my parents activities passing information to the Soviets concerning a possible (probable) nuking in 54. So what, I thought. They are dead. My motive was to place something in the correspondence that would force U.S. Attorney to pass the information to higher levels.
Now it is early 96, and I saw the plutonium hit the
fan. Large steganography reading
“Childhood Memories
Unreliable”. (Long story,
but I could see that this was me.)
What had I touched on? Yes,
this would be somewhat sensitive, but not that
sensitive. So I
thought.
And it was this that led to the steccatto clanks of Colby’s Murder,
Boorda’s Murder, and Flight 800, and with it the full sick realization
of what I had done. Apparently the information, or at least all of it, regarding
my parents were not passed to the other parties in the East as was per the
agreement. The most serious
of issue on the planet. But
was this not old?
54?
No. It was the very present
issue of interfering with witness.
Say you had a group of drug lords in a city each with an unacceptably
awful weapon such as a nuke. They
have a secret deal that if any serious talk comes up within each gang of
really using a nuke they must share all the
details. That sharing is the
essential, ultimately necessary glue.
Let us say a witness is found stating that at some time in the past,
even quite a bit in the past, there was cheating; that there was ‘serious
talk’. And let us also
say that it is seen that the witness is being disabled, harmed, by the gang
he was in. Is not that
present cheating? Would not that gang, considering the seriousness
of the issue, have a hard time regaining
trust? Would not they accept,
even invite, punishment under those
circumstances? It was beginning to dawn on me why they would go to such
trouble to defuse what I was saying, kill others but not
me.
Colby, Boorda, 800. One,
two, three. I told Krulac.
Krulac would have had to pass it to his superior,
Boorda. Many at the top would need to
know. At the highest, albet illegal, level decisions would need
to be made. A full disclosure
must immediately be made known to all
parties. There would be a need
to create a punishment, and that punishment would need be
accepted. In other words there
was a relatively short process that led to the shoot-down wherein both Colby
and Boorda are killed. If you
can imagine, this would need be a very heavy discussion at the level of all
nuclear powers. Testy to the
max.
First let us go to the evidence of what did happen with the shoot-down
on July 17th, 1996.
Hundreds of witnesses saw the missile go up and hit the
plane. The government in working
conjunction with the media put out a silly wing tank
story. Because exposure trumps,
most of the public bought into the wing tank, silly as it
was. What is to be done with
the disbelievers? They certainly could not be told the real
story! A secondary story was
cleverly fostered which for a time fooled many honest reporters who were
set up to give a secondary story that it was some horrid error in a naval
exercise. This was a good
ploy. If 99 % believed the first
media-fed wing tank story, and of that 1% that were not fooled by that, if
you get 99% to believe a false story, you fairly much clear the
board. There were some strange
facts that did not fit. First
there is irrefutable evidence of navy Seals being in place in small boats
below the plane prior to shoot-down.
That might be to rescue possible survivors, certainly not to expect
an accident. A few weeks prior to the shoot-down jet fighters were
escorting airliners in flights out of Miami.
Why? Witnesses, (Perry et al),
saw a warship unusually close to land with no watch just prior to the shoot-down
off of Fire Island. They gave
a detailed description of the warship.
They were interviewed, (guided!) and it was made to look like they
were identifying an American Spruance-class
destroyer. This was done by
pointing to a tiny picture in a Janes Fighting
Ships. That very small picture
had information balloons, much like dialogue boxes in
comics. The picture was reduced
such that you could hardly tell they were information not part of the
ship. In the description they
told of a giant globe amidships but toward the
bow. The Spruance-class had
no such structure. It was an
information balloon. Perry et
at were, in the written statement, exactly describing not an American warship,
but a British Frigate, the H.M.S.
Norfolk, which has a very unique bow and at that time, not now (go to
old pics), had a giant globe structure.
Why a British warship? Here
is the real key: Thousands of
credible witnesses saw the missile go up and shoot down the plane just hours
after on CNN. Yet with that
thousands of credible witnesses also claim they were watching CNN all through
that time period and saw no such thing.
How is this possible?
Easy. CNN is
cable. There was a limited broadcast of the
shoot-down.
Why?
Though present situation was interfering with witness, the distal
aspect was the near use of two atomic bombs to help the French who were in
dire straits loosing Dien Bien Phu in the spring of
1954. What better punishment
than a flight to France? But
where is the sting? Have the
offending party agree to a limited airing of the
shoot-down. Make them scramble
a bit to cover. As some American
flights from Miami had fighter escort a few weeks prior, you can see that
there was a discussion during this time.
I imagine a harsh and urgent one.
It was in this discussion proceeding 800 that first Colby and then
Boorda were murdered. From Kay Griggs I understand that Colby was done by a
young foreign assassin who did not know who he did until he heard on the
news and freaked out. Both Colby
and Boorda made large statements regarding the deal prior to their
murders. Colby is known for
stating that the illegal drug industry is now more powerful than any
state. That quote has been bantered about quite a bit on Internet,
but mostly in regard to just the scope of illegal drugs and the amount of
government involvement. It takes
far deeper meaning as you understand that the illegal drug industry has become
over time the checking mechanism for the most necessary deal on the
planet. Boorda’s statement
was more precious, but at a higher level
loud. He arranged to speak at
the Mass Maritime Academy
Following this there were shrill headlines, “Highly Inappropriate
For High Ranking Naval Officer To Speak At Merchant
Academy”. Two days prior
to this speaking engagement there is a bullet in his
heart. This long lasting
‘inappropriateness’ had to do with separation of military and
civil. It was, and is, a deep
issue in that respect. In fact,
at the time, that is how I initially took the
move. Most were no where near
the level to react to this headline/message at
all. I remember at the time
screaming at some youngsters who were hanging around the house drinking beer
that they should have probably gut shot the
SOB.
No. He was really saying
that the intelligence has gotten out of hand, that this was a major screw
up, and that the international militaries should establish their own intelligence
in this area to counter balance.
This was a threat to the forces that Colby had just indicated had
taken control. Drug dealers
are not military, but they are certainly not civil
either. When flight 800 did
come down it did not take me long to put that
together. With it was the gut
wrenching realization that I had started this chain of events and left with
only the five words of anybody in a similar situation,
“How was I to
know?”
I have come to regard Admiral Boorda as one of the finest naval officers
there ever was. These men, Boorda
and Colby, were not too far ahead of the
curve. They were seeing that
the forces in control back then,
in ‘96, were behind the nuke perception curve, as they are now
dangerously behind. I had discussed Flight 800 with many over the Internet
for a number of years. Superb
disinformationalists infiltrated the major discussion
groups. They even forced off
one of the best investigators, Commander
Donaldson. Commander Donaldson
continued to believe that the shoot-down was a simple terrorist
act. In a radio interview he
fairly much allowed that up until Flight 800 he had always believed major
media. Like many the barrier
to seeing the real picture was almost entirely
emotional. Many who wrote to
me expressed this insight.
Although far from proof positive they saw that only the scenario I
was giving fit all the facts. But
that it was gut wrenching hard to think on that
level. They admitted that they
had trouble, not seeing it, but feeling the
horror. They were simply not used to balancing that horror with
the far greater horror of nukes and being able to prioritize. Such is the
stratosphere. Donaldson
was an exceptionally honest investigator and continued to report findings
that did not support his theory, the placement of the Seals among
them. To really sit in the august
stratosphere is to understand that you must deal with situations as they
are given, not what you might want them to be, and that the Kenndys had to
die. It is to understand that
no matter how terrible Flight 800 was that it
simply had to be agreed
to. However now, as the illegal
aspects of the deal, the drugs and churning of black budgets, have more taken
over the thinking, the stratosphere thinking is falling
apart. Atta was identified as
a terrorist by an Army group way before
9/11. They could not pursue
as it interrupted a heroin ring.
Those in control can not maintain the stratosphere, they must give
priority to protecting themselves.
For this same reason many possible and even probable nuke threats
would not even be investigated. The investigations would be curtailed by higher ups.
Now we have a landscape with another group of thugs, enemies to one degree or another. At least the major belligerents need play at being enemies to some degree to keep the checking mechanism in place. At first blush the major thugs look like China and Russia against America with reluctant allies. At a lower level, the level of most who even think they are in the know, Israel is seen as aligned with the U.S., though in many deeper aspects caught in the middle. There was a bully plan from the U.S. to take over all emerging oil pipelines. The Third World, always outside the secret agreements, was discounted as being able to be pushed around with ease. The major bullies are posturing with the minor Third World thugs gathered around. The higher aspects of the West assume they have all bases covered as through the Cold War they have been playing both sides, involved to one degree or another in all terrorist groups. Anger builds up against the major bully, the US. Standing behind the smaller Third World bullies are minor groups in the process of forming. These are unknown, new, and angry. Seeing an opportunity one of these minor bullies, who cares not if he would be labeled terrorist or ‘rogue’, walks up behind the big bully and whacks him with a two by four. This would be a minor ‘kid brother’ bully not only with the capability of obtaining the material, delivering it and constructing it, but also with the wisdom not to involve governments or known terrorist groups.
Throughout the Cold
War the use of nuclear arms was controlled through altering mass perception
regarding the real issues. But
this mass perception, the real trigger, is now
changing. There is large portion,
most really, of the world that considers 9/11 to have been a false
flag. Within the United States, even within the military, there
is a significant and growing slice that also holds this
view. In this case the reality
does not matter. The ‘new
enemy’ will see that any attack would most likely, to one degree or
another, be blamed on portions of the US
Government. The very belligerent
administration is now under heavy legal
attack. They would benefit from
a US city being nuked at this juncture in any case, whether they were a party
to it or not. They now need
a siege mentality to survive.
Therefore, if or not the higher aspects of government would really
go that far is almost now not the point.
In a sense there is, like December 7th, an unspoken
consensus. Japan really was an
enemy. We have created a vast
amount of mini Japans with younger angry brothers.
Admiral Keating,
with dainty glove, uses the standard form of mil babble and calls his exercise
“…robust…” The exercise, like Van Riper cramped
Millennium 2003, is scripted so he will win. As foil Keating chooses a nuke
coming in by yacht, the most common example bantered at
top. That is a great example
in one respect as it asks how can every lead keel be
disassembled. Still the enabling
Keating might have chose a scenario less common, but of such wit the Admiral
seems not to have one un-split atom.
He might have, with at least a speck of imagination, chose at least
a hundred things by varying the tone:
Rustic: There are numerous
hippie communities living in the Canadian north woods with no government
contact. Here the mining could
be done nearby, the delivery by canoe, coonskin caps disguising even a Martian
as thoroughly American.
Flighty…: Giant
would be the flock of homing pigeons, each with a pellet, that would add
to 62 pounds. Snipping the
containers from the legs of such a then radiation-sick flock from behind
lead glass with a little robot too much of an affront to animal
rights. Though this could be
managed with a fond research, the Admiral loves the little birds, I
think?
Classic…: He could
have gone under the real radar again in the elegantly direct manner that
young Mathius Rust flew all the way from Iceland and landed a piper cub on
Red Square. Lofty…: Balloon it. Practical…: simply
import. The variations of what
could hold a pellet cased in lead, in easy disguise, are endless, from dignified
with a shipment of archeological artifacts, fragile and insured with enough
of the figurines gouged gouged out to make up for the added
lead. Bubbly: Large
liquid containers of any sort would be a
snap. Styrofoam would
be placed around the lead containers to stop any clanking and Styrofoam also
at the top replacing the lost weight.
Buddha statues would be more thoughtful. Another silly Internet rumor
fostered is that transported uranium could be picked up by
satellite. With the inverse
square law and even a little shielding that is
impossible. Were such the case
the instruments would far sooner be picking up dental
offices. At present the John
Paul Jones is involved with a host of other navies in the South Pacific in
a sea terrorist hunting exercise. These exercises have really been ongoing for some time
and have been posted on Admiral Blair’s
APN. They have produced an
interesting statistic. For the
last year or so there has been a dramatic decrease in world
piracy. But to think they could
stop serious parties from transporting a nuke at sea is
silly.
It is this
‘unspoken consensus’ and the change in mass perception that is
pulling the trigger. The specifics
now almost do not matter. We
need immediately go back to the year after the two bombs were dropped on
Japan and rethink the issue worldwide.
We must clearly see what this new nuclear landscape is really
saying.
“Freeze.
Drop your guns.” Chances for this are not good.
A nuke is just a weapon. Fundamentally it has been used and only collective will, consensus – collaboration, can stop it from being used again. Even as they made the secret deals in the late forties and early fifties they knew that they could not hold forever, that eventually legal deals would need be made. That was considered, as they lied to the masses, (and a large part of the ruler elite as well), to be a fundamental truth. And it was also considered fundamental truth that these sorts of arrangements should never be continued in any situation where real enemies outside the deal could be prompted to use nukes. That control was more having them ‘line up’ East or West with unseen understanding at top. Suddenly the world shifts to where it is no longer East vs. West but mainly the industrialized north of the equator against the Third World. The U.S. population might be fooled into thinking nukes hard to make. Those becoming real enemies are not so fooled. Even the technology has changed such that robot type equipment behind leaded glass could almost entirely be found at Toys-R-Us. Suddenly, over the course of just a few years, there are vast areas of the world that hate and mistrust the US. America has now made real enemies who are learning quickly how to fight back as time goes by. They see the United States now as a dangerous nuke bully. If any serious player had a choice between a nuke or a biological or chemical which would likely be chosen? . Which would be most appropriate? The clock is ticking. With Hiroshima and Nagasaki the nuke card has already been played. The US continues to act like a nuke bully. If you attack others with deadly weapons they tend to attack back. That is very fundamental. Part of the consensus toward a nuking is the very infantile attitude of the general American public that it could never happen to Uncle Sam. The neocon Sam is almost begging for it to be played again. Of course it can be played again. A nuke is still a nuke. Rummy ‘s still a kook. The fundamental things apply as time goes by.
Sincerely,
Michael Donovan, Camden, Maine
Cc: Nigeria
HMI@heartofafrica.net
HMI@heartofafrica.net, General
Musevini: utb@starcom.co.ug
utb@starcom.co.ug, apaiva@embavenez-us.org
apaiva@embavenez-us.org, North
Korea korun@undp.org korun@undp.org,
General Ozkok bilgi@basbakanlik.gov.tr , Syria Hafez
Al-Assad
contact@niceonline.org
contact@niceonline.org, Madam
Shenyou defence@chinaembassy.org.nz
defence@chinaembassy.org.nz,
Admiral Keating northcompa@northcom.mil
Admiral Yurchenko
museum@mail.admiral.ru
museum@mail.admiral.ru
,
Iran
webmaster@president.ir
<webmaster@president.ir>
The above letter details secret arrangements concerning non use of nuclear weapons, arrangements that are falling apart. The additional file below details the information that was passed to Criminal Division, U.S. Attorneys office, Boston, in 95 and to General Krulac in 96 prompting the murder of Colby, then Boorda and the shootdown of flight 800. It has been expanded and made into a play, A Spy In Time. Synopsis: It is 1954 in the family’s home in Pound Ridge, a very rural setting but still in commuting distance from Manhattan. The French are unexpectedly beginning to lose their war in Indochina. The wife of Time Magazine’s mapmaker pressures him to gather more information at Time and help her alert the Soviet Union of American plans to help the French with ‘two last atomic bombs’. Viewed through the eyes of their ten-year-old son, this espionage in the middle of the McCarthy era strains the marriage.
********
end
Kent, the Cindy Sheehan vigil nationwide was a turning point. I think the
demonstration in NYC planned for September 11th is very important as it is
targeting the media as lying about 9/11. Finally we are going after the right
target. Again we don't want things to fall apart too quickly. We want a world
understanding of what has really been going
on.