The question has often been asked "How could a man of Francis Bacons'
influence, power and position be defamed, discredited and made irrelevant
the way he was and why?"

Even though today Francis Bacon remains an enigma of controversial topic
(his role as son of Queen Elizabeth I the virgin Queen, his relationship to
Robert Lord Essex, his roles in founding Rosicrucianism and resurrecting
Free Masonry, in the colonisation of America and in the editing of the King
James Bible and the authorship of the Works of Shakespeare) provides more
than enough incentive to the scholar and so is probably studied as much as
any other noteworthy figure in history.

Strangely however, Francis seems cloaked from mainstream view, much like the
Gomerite red dragons lair - the country of Wales.

My view is that once Francis Bacon accomplished the bidding of the dynasty,
he and all ties to the dynasty needed to be erased or at least minimised to
make connections difficult to trace and associate back to the Gomerite
dynasty and the master agenda they had Francis formulate. How better to do
this than use the traditional "rubbing out" of the agents reputation through
character assassination and hence forever drift a darkened cloud over the
otherwise enviable persona of the exalted -- thus diminishing future
acclamation and therefore risk of association.

Francis and the legacy of his work for them, was and is a dangerous exposure
for the Gomerite inner sanctum, their mission statement, objectives and
their prime goal.

Francis public career ended in disgrace in 1621 when, after having fallen
into debt, a Parliamentary Committee on the administration of the law
charged him with corruption under twenty-three counts; and so clear was the
evidence that he made no attempt at defence. To the lords, who sent a
committee to inquire whether the confession was really his, he replied, "My
lords, it is my act, my hand, and my heart; I beseech your lordships to be
merciful to a broken reed." He was sentenced to a fine of £40,000, remitted
by the king, to be committed to the Tower of London during the king's
pleasure (his imprisonment in fact lasted only a few days). More seriously,
Lord St Alban was declared incapable of holding future office or sitting in
parliament. He narrowly escaped being deprived of his titles. Thenceforth
the disgraced viscount devoted himself to study and writing.

However substantial evidence by Nieves Mathews is demonstrated in her book,
Francis Bacon: The History of a Character Assassination (1996, Yale
University Press) that Bacon was completely innocent of the bribery charges
and that writers from later times were themselves guilty of slandering
Bacon's reputation. Bacon, commenting on his impeachment as Chancellor in
which he claims to have been forced to plead guilty to bribery charges in
order to save King James from a political scandal stated:

I was the justest judge, that was in England these last fifty years. When
the book of all hearts is opened, I trust I shall not be found to have the
troubled fountain of a corrupt heart. I know I have clean hands and a clean
heart. I am as innocent of bribes as any born on St Innocents Day.

The Gomerite nightmare is exposure before completion of the goal.