4/17/02 3:51:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time
in
response to your comment on Beardens chapter 11.
EDITOR: If and only IF these patents
get sabotaged, why not release the specs and everyone just build the damn
thing and send donations to Bearden out of human respect. Beginning to think
this is the ultimate process that Free-Energy wizards, well, all the dreamers,
must face. Pooh on lockstep establishment prunehead procedures. I once
had a High School Science teacher with his students building transistor radios
before they were seriously launched on the market. Sell MEG-experiment
kits, that'll do it. The greater problem: either we begin to build a real
culture or we are to be forever cursed with this Roman-style merchant-warrior
garbage forever.
FLASH:ACC ANNOUNCES ITS PLANS TO PRODUCE THE TCAP
WITHOUT PATENTING. AMERICAN COMPUTER INDICATED THAT IT WAS GOING STRAIGHT
TO PRODUCTION OF ITS NEW TCAP BASED STORAGE DEVICES WITHOUT BOTHERING TO
PROTECT THEM WITH PATENTS. ACC SAID IT WOULD BE PLACING THE ENTIRE "DOCUMENTS
OF KNOW HOW" REGARDING THE TCAP INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN SO THAT NO ONE WOULD
BE ABLE TO PATENT THE TCAP. CITING INTERNATIONAL TREATIES PROTECTING TRADE
IN TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE DERIVED FROM SPACE EXPLORATION AND OUTER SPACE,
ACC INDICATED THAT PATENTING THE TCAP WOULD SIMPLY HAVE MADE IT MORE DIFFICULT
FOR ALL THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD TO BENEFIT FROM IT. SO, ACC SIMPLY INDICATED
IT WAS GOING TO ACT AS THE AGENT OF TCAP TECHNOLOGY, BUILDING AND SELLING
IT IN SUCH A WAY AS IT WOULD BE VERY EASY TO REPRODUCE BY OTHER BUSINESSES.
ACC NOTED THAT DESPITE ITS PLACEMENT OF THE KNOW HOW INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN,
IT FELT CONFIDENT THAT IT WOULD HOLD THE LEAD IN TCAP TECHNOLOGY FOR DECADES
TO COME.
Sandia is, in essence, part of the Department of Energy. To secure EPA approval,
ACC must overcome the objections of the EPA and the DOE!! It must also surmount
opposition, if any, by Lockheed Martin, which operates Sandia. Lockheed also
provides THE SAME OPERATING SERVICES to the EPA. Lockheed has announced that
it is presently MERGING with AT&T's LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES / Bell Laboratories
(putting Bell Labs back in the seat of operating Sandia Corporation all over
again!!!!)
One can not help but
WONDER at how these AT&T companies just seem to SOMEHOW JUST GET PUT
IN CONTROL over every single legal governmental avenue available to technology
development concerns in the United States... Could it be no accident? Could
the rumors of AT&T opposition to Microsoft, that AT&T (scorned developer
of the highly technical UNIX operating system) is behind the anti-trust activity
against Microsoft... could it all be true? Are Sun and Netscape really AT&T
'outside subsidiaries', like Lucent and Lockheed? Are rumors that Bernard
Schwartz of Lockheed/Loral was behind the creation of Sun Micro, from the
failed Sun Terminal Company that originated, allegedly, on the back of AT&T
Bell Labs envelopes at a favorite AT&T watering hole behind Sun Fish
Pond in Watchung, New Jersey, just around the corner from Bell Labs in Murray
Hill (but didn't make it when it first emerged at Columbia University in
the early 80's)? Have we all been 'HOODWINKED' by a very aggressive misdirection
scheme that originated at AT&T? Has AT&T been prejudicing the very
operation of our
Government?
from:http://roswellinternet.com/