Subject: RE: BOMBSHELL! Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of MicrochippedPopulation!
Date: 2/8/2007 12:09:01 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
Dear all,
I received a response from my friend when I asked him to comment how true the story is. With his permission, I would like to share with you his perspective which you might find useful for your own reflection, 'reflections on the precipice of extinction' for the world -- without any exaggeration -- indeed totters on that precipice. Please read the below in blue.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, who is "Nicholas" Rockerfeller? I googled and only found one reference -- to being a California Republican who backed Clinton/Gore in 1996.
A rational analysis of world events can't be based on "psst ... let me tell you now what X privately told me before". particularly when the person going "psst" is hyping his film and/or himself.
Frankly I haven't found it worthwhile to follow the 9/11 "inside job" hypothesis -- not because the neo-con powerholders have any moral qualms about commiting heinous acts, they don't, but because they commit their heinous acts in full public view --- Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, and more --- where they can be analyzed without resort to speculating on "psst" conversations.
This is not to say they don't have "private" plans. I was interviewing Paul Craig Roberts, former assistant secretary of the treasury under Reagan and previously an editor of the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal -- no leftist obviously -- who denounced Bush on air as the "most dangerous man since Hitler", a man who cannot tell the truth, and Roberts posited that the planning for the war against Iran might well include a faked "provocation" (an attack on a US military vessel in the region), attributed to Iran but in fact commited by Israel. This "provocation" then would be used to "justify" the pre-existing US-Israel plan to bomb Iran, likely with nuclear weapons (bunker buster bombs). But as Roberts himself explained, Bush's intentions to wage war against Iran were in the "surge" speech, which the lap-dog media mis-framed as a speech about Iraq. And Israel's push for this war is equally public, as is their bombing of a US military vessel in the Mediterranean in 1967 as an intentional part of Israel's war plans then.
Brezinski, himself a merciless cold warrior and like Roberts a part of that faction of the US ruling elite who see the neo-cons and Israel wrecking the US empire -- testified before Congress last week, forewarning Senators of much the same scenario as Roberts outlined in my interview. Again it's not a matter of the US never before committing such deceptions and ruthlessness: President Johnson did exactly this in the war against the people of Indochina ("Tonkin incident") well-documented in Daniel Elsberg's magnificent history based on his own insider participation, titled "Secrets". So if we know that historically the US has done this, if we know that there is no moral restraint against deceit or atrocity, if we know that they are planning a war, then we have no need of "psst-conversations". Enough information is there for people to act upon.
Are the ruling elites racists, contemptuous of the lives of the peoples in Africa, Latin America and Asia? Isn't the evidence for that -- historical and contemporary -- also part of the public record? They are fully aware that their current "globalization" schemes result in unprecedented immiseration of billions, ruining and fore-shortening lives? Isn't the repression of democratic rights in all the bourgeois democracies ---rationalized by the laughably implausible motive of a "war on terror" --- proceeding apace with restriction of expression, extension of monitoring, arbitrary imprisonment and torture without moral restraint? All this is public! What is added by a person trying to "authenticate this with "psst-gossip" -- except to make that person appear more important and powerful? And even if we heard all the "psst-conversations", how would that help us to organize to defeat these monstrous schemes?
This is not the missing piece in north american adolescent political culture that explains predominant passivity on these matters.
But the people who indulge in "psst-information" are not, in my limited experience, at the forefront of organizing popular resistance. They seem to be more intent on sharing their fears, rather than raising peoples' confidence in their own capacities to take destiny into their hands.
If you manage to make the Canpalnet organized public forum on "Canadian Foreign Policy and the Influence of the Israel Lobby" Feb 14 at the downtown public library, you won't hear this type of "psst-insider" exposition, but a rational and fact-based analysis from the speaker, which is the only kind of 'education' that can empower us.
---------------------------------------------------
First, who is "Nicholas" Rockerfeller? I googled and only found one reference -- to being a California Republican who backed Clinton/Gore in 1996.