8/3/2005 4:11:45 AM Pacific Standard Time
from a forum posting at
http://tomflocco.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=3143&sid=858006e33ca7ff30486f1256862a07e0#3143
In any event, here is some background information..
The address of the 'Dirksen Federal Building', where Fitzgerald works, is:
219 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60604
The intersection where the subway in Chicago was evacuated was:
E Roosevelt Rd & S State St, Chicago, IL 60605
The article that mentioned this evacuation was the Chicago Tribune. The article
has since been removed from their website. The origional link was:
Original
Chicago Tribune article removed
You can find the text of this article backed up on this guy's blog:
http://johnsbracken.blogspot.com/2005/07/red-line-shut-for-suspicious-package.html
You can prove that the article was actually run but then later removed by
running this search on news.google.com:
Tribune
article on subway "evacuation" ran---but then was removed
You can see where this federal building is in relations to the 'red line'
of the Chicago subway on this map here (look in the center of the big oval
for a building labeled 'Federal Center' at the intersection of Adams and
Dearborn - blue line is on that street):
http://www.transitchicago.com/maps/maps/F2004D.html
You can get a much better feel for all of this by getting Google Earth from
here:
http://earth.google.com/
In google earth you can turn on the 'Transit - Local Rail' layer and see
exactly where the blue and red subway lines run relative to the evacuation
point and the federal building addresses. from what i can tell the evacuation
was on the red line as reported, and the federal building is over the blue
line, but somewhat close to the red line.
hope that helps for anyone trying to research this stuff.
______________-
The zip codes made me wonder where zip code 60606 was?
http://www.city-data.com/zips/60606.html
right on the bend of the Chicago River and here's the address for the Sear's
Tower at 233 S WHACKER Dr!!!:
http://www.thesearstower.com/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------
8/3/2005 4:23:41 AM Pacific Standard Time
Here's just another FYI.
Time line is that the Subway scare was on Monday the l8th.
Indictment Monday the 1st.
Exactly two weeks apart.
---------------------------------------------------------
8/3/2005 4:45:12 AM Pacific Standard Time
from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sears_Tower
"On May 4th, l973, when completed, the Sears Tower had overtaken the twin
towers of the World Trade Center as the world’s tallest building."
World Trade Tower ribbon cutting 4-4-1973
Sear's Tower complete 5-4-1973
Interestingly, 5/4/1973 is 5/4 11 or 9-11! <G>
so 4/4/1973 is 8-11?
Bush presidential re-elect campaign kick off 5-3-2004.
World Trade Center re-design unveiling 5-5-2005.
-------------------------------------
8/3/2005 5:14:02 AM Pacific Standard Time
Fitzgerald Background
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55560-2005Feb1.html
and possible time snaffu "Hastert to Can Patrick Fitzgerald" in October?
http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/7/27/232930/764
-------------------------------------
FORUM:
CHICAGO
POLICE IMPLICATED IN COVER UP OF British MI6 agents
Patrick J. Fitzgerald
United States Attorney
United States Attorney´s Office
219 S. Dearborn St., 5th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
Phone: (312) 353-5300
Fax: (312) 353-2067
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/aboutus/index.html#Chicago
--------------------------------------------------
8/4/2005 7:46 pm EDT
http://www.tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78
More About Those Nuclear Attack Speculations
Before I get to the current rumor mill, I want you to think about why it
might be important to pay attention to rumors even if they never pan out.
Consider the rumors that can serve us well financially. When we come across
buzz about a corporate takeover or a drug about to be approved by the FDA,
what do we do? Many of us do the smart thing, we inquire. We call our broker
or we talk to knowledgeable friends, just in case there is something to the
rumor. If there is a way to take advantage of what we heard, we do not want
to miss a good opportunity. Some of us will even skip an intensive validation
process before we put in a buy or sell order with a trusted, low fee, on-line
brokerage service. Sometimes it’s worth risking a little in order to
gain a lot.
It seems that when it comes to personal gain or profit, we are willing follow
through on rumors. Even more interesting, we also are willing to admit that
others know more than we do. When it comes to making a buck, we seem more
ready to listen to people who have some knowledge about things we know little
or nothing about. We will seek out people with some expertise in areas in
which we have absolutely no experience. When we come across stock
“tips” on the financial rumor mill, we have no problem placing
our trust in other sources. If some of these tips fall flat and disappoint
us, we don’t stop trusting these more informed sources. We continue
to have faith in their good intentions and we wait eagerly for the next bit
of market gossip to come along.
Why, then, do the attitudes of most people change so dramatically when the
“tips” are rumors that involve their government? Most, and I repeat
most of us do not understand the powerful factors that control the governments
of the world. Most people have a view of the world as it is presented in
school books. They have no idea that a handful of very wealth, very powerful,
and very well entrenched people wield enormous power over most of us. There
is no room here to discuss this huge and complicated topic in detail. Suffice
it to say that some very powerful people have inordinate power to influence
the agendas of many governments of the world. This is not a conspiracy theory,
this is fact. Before you pass judgment, do some reading and find out for
yourself. Spend some time looking up the private adjuncts to our governmental
bodies: the Bilderberg Group, the Illuminati and the World Bank. Research
the Tri-Lateral Commission, the National Security Council and the Council
on Foreign Relations. Then ask yourself why these unelected bodies are so
closely and consistently entangled in so many aspects of so many governments.
Then ask yourself why do the members of these groups also have deep ties
to many multi-national corporations; many of which are energy, defense and
media related. We are not just talking about one or two conflicts of interest
here. We are talking about people who sit on the boards of multiple companies
and who are involved in these secretive yet powerful organizations. Who do
they actually represent; the corporations or the organizations? Why is it
that only that extremely wealthy and corporately connected individuals are
involved in these organizations?
But let’s do some of your homework right here. One example is a power
group with inordinate influence over the policies of the Bush administration,
yet totally hidden to most Americans.. This group is one of the most easily
researched and verifiable of all: the Project for a New American Century
(PNAC). The motives and goals of this organization are not secret. They are
not some mythical theory. They are not the paranoid fabrication of a tinfoil
hat conspiracy nut. The agenda of this organization is available for all
to see. Their plans and visions are clearly detailed on their own website.
Their activities, past and present, are recorded and archived for everyone
to examine. These are the people who proposed war with Afghanistan and Iraq
long before 9/11. These are the people who designed the doctrine for global
military superiority long before George Bush was even a candidate for the
presidency. And today, these are the people who hold an extraordinary number
of key positions in every major foreign policy department of the US government.
They are seen and heard over and over on the corporate media. They are invited
to offer advice and give opinions to an unsuspecting public that never hears
a single word about their relationship to PNAC.
Thanks to the controlled corporate media, most Americans have no idea who
these people are. PNAC members hold dozens of key positions in the Bush
administration. They are never identified as being members of PNAC. There
is never mention of their common affiliation and history. Oddly, the one
non PNAC person in the White House is George W. Bush. He is the outsider.
Research this group and you will find that many of these key members of the
Bush administration were once known in Washington as “The Crazies!”
These men - and women, who have been connected to several past administrations,
supported agendas that were so radical that that they were kept out of positions
in which they could really do some harm. Today, they direct, and control
the foreign & military policies of the United States. That is not an
exaggeration. Keep this in mind when you get to the rumor mill portion of
this blog.
This being said, let’s understand there is a pretty good chance that
there are people who know a great deal more about the power brokers behind
our government than the average American. Many of you might be ahead of the
curve on this and may have read up on the topics I mentioned. You may also
have listened to or read the works of Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Meria Heller,
Whatreallyhappened.com, David Ickey or others on the Internet. There is a
great deal of information about these power brokers out there for those who
really want to know.
Sadly, many people simply dismiss these sources as the ranting of crackpots
or conspiracy theorists whose information is not credible. They do this without
ever considering the validity of what is claimed. By doing this, they place
themselves in the same class of those who dismissed the round-world theorists.
These people could not and would not open their minds to any idea that refuted
their belief that the world was flat. They ridiculed and denigrated the findings
of people who, in fact, knew what they were saying, and who knew more than
their deriders. This made no sense at the time, and makes no sense now. It
is self defeating and possibly dangerous to ignore the words of informed
sources. It makes even less sense to dismiss them outright before they ever
have a chance to be heard.
It makes a great deal more sense to have an open mind about information that
has been researched and documented, especially when that information directly
affects your life. This is not unlike accepting, or at least considering
information about your health given to you by a doctor. You may not have
a clue about the technical facts leading to the diagnosis, but you listen
to what is being said. When you go home, you might research the condition
that was described. You might get a second professional opinion and ask others
about the condition. Finally, after listening and asking and reading and
thinking, you discern the validity of what the doctor told you. You would
not simply dismiss the claims made by your doctor because you were unable
deal with what you heard. Even if the diagnosis was bizarre and too extreme
to accept at the moment,. you would not dismiss it outright. You would not
allow your lack of medical knowledge to get in the way of accepting life
saving information. Obviously, that close-minded approach could very well
endanger, if not end your life. By the time you figure out that the doctor
was right, it might be too late to use what he had to say.
So, why not take this approach with other vital issues such as those involving
the government? It might be an essential strategy for becoming more open-minded
and ultimately more aware of what goes on in this very complex and confusing
world. It also might be helpful in finding ways to distinguish legitimate
information from unfounded rumor. You really can’t lose if you listen
and think about things you are tempted to dismiss or ignore. At worst, you
will have wasted some time. But at best you might be on the receiving end
of some very valuable information. Bear in mind what was just said: a
close-minded approach could endanger your life. You really wouldn’t
want to start listening when it was too late to use the information.
Okay. I think I’ve made my point, so on with the rumors:
As some of you know, there are many rumors afoot about state-sponsored, false
flag, nuclear terror attacks right here in the good old USA. You can catch
up on these rumors by reading my last piece on the topic by clicking here.
Recent events are adding fuel to the rumors, and suggest that the final pieces
of the puzzle may be falling into place. Here is some background:
1. The entire rumor is based on the concept that elements within the government
(and their adjuncts, see above) are intent on creating a New World Order
in the form of a single world government.
2. In order for the people to go along with these plans events have to take
place that create an atmosphere of great fear. Frightened citizens will permit
their government to do anything so long as they believe it is for their own
safety. This is an old psychological ploy that has been used successfully
by governments in the past. At present, the American government promotes
and engenders constant fear in the public. In part this is done, as it was
during the Cold War years, to finance the military industrial complex. When
the Cold War ended, military budgets needed new life - so along came the
international terrorist. For war profiteers there is no better enemy than
one that can not be seen or identified, and ultimately can never be defeated.
There can be no end to a war on the catch phrase, “Terrorism” .
Terrorists are not an enemy that can surrender, so there is no way to tell
when the military effort has succeeded. The war that is being waged today
is the perfect never-ending war that will provide a never-ending flow of
funds. It is the perfect business plan for the military industrial complex.
An enemy that can not be identified can not be defeated. Everlasting war
is the result. Everlasting war funding is the goal.
3. The PNAC crew, formerly know as the Crazies, control a virtual dictatorship.
As we speak, there is no oversight or accountability in the Bush administration.
Those in power do pretty much whatever they want. Their march into Iraq was
a prime example of the way they do business. The world stood still as the
administration, with the help of their corporate adjunct, the mainstream
media, convinced the American people that Iraq was to be feared. This was
a ludicrous claim that was almost laughable. Iraq was a smashed and defeated
nation with no military to speak of, that had undergone 12 years of crippling
embargoes and 12 years of bombing raids and they were the ideological enemy
of Al Qaeda. There was nothing to fear, but fear we did so that phase one
of the PNAC plan could go into action.
4. Don’t believe for a moment that the PNAC crew that took control of
our government will ever let go of that power. They waited too long and planned
too hard to stop in their tracks. They assumed power by stealing elections
and reaping the benefits of the “new Pearl Harbor” they themselves
said they needed. On September 11th, 2001, these not-so-crazy men went into
full gear. The oil pipelines to the Caspian could be fully in their hands
if Afghanistan and Iraq were under their control A rapid defeat of these
countries would lead to domination of the region. Despite the setbacks to
their poorly laid, albeit ambitious plans, these people are here for the
duration. There is no way this long awaited power is going to slip through
their hands. This is a now or never opportunity for to achieve the goals
they openly laid out year before.
5. There is no possible argument to refute the reality that the people in
power today needed a tragedy like 9/11 to take place. Without it, there would
have been no opportunity at all, none, nada, nil, to implement their openly
published agenda. Without the attacks of that day, there would be no wars
against Afghanistan or Iraq. Saddam Hussein would be trading his oil in Euros,
the pipelines of the oil rich Middle East would be in the hands of other
nations, and the ambitions of the PNAC power brokers would be in the garbage.
For whatever it’s worth, this is a harsh reality. Think about it.
Here is what has recently changed:
1.The public is beginning to catch on to what is going on. Questions are
being asked. Answers are being demanded.
2. There is a groundswell of public interest in the events of 9/11. A great
deal of new evidence has been uncovered by the independent 9/11 research
community that exposes the official story of 9/11 as the real conspiracy
theory. A great deal of evidence points to government complicity, at least
to the level of permitting the events to unfold. The media can no longer
stem the grass roots information campaign taking place. The more people examine
the findings of the independent community, the more they realize that something
sinister is at hand. One can not view the uncovered information without becoming
suspicious about what the Bush administration knew and when they knew it.
3. The Plame investigation is coming to a head. According to recent reports,
indictments have already been issued or are underway. The investigation
reportedly goes far beyond the leak of a CIA agent, and has looked into
illegalities by people at the highest levels of government concerning 9/11
and the war in Iraq.
4. If we get past the midterm elections and vote rigging is under control,
there is a chance that many members of Congress will be getting their walking
papers. If Republicans lose control of Congress there is a chance that
impeachment proceedings will take place. The grounds for impeachment of the
President and Vice President have been clearly established - and include
the high crimes of lying to Congress, and manipulating intelligence information
for political gain.
What does all this mean? Let’s consider the most recent rumors that
involve the indictment of people in high places. Such an event will mean
the end of the PNAC dream. This is why they have to work fast, before any
such indictments are issued or before too much truth gets out. This
administration cannot risk letting Americans know really took place on 9/11.
That, too, would mean the end of the PNAC dream.
The last pieces of the PNAC power structure were just put in place. John
Bolton is Ambassador to the UN. He is PNAC. Zalmay Khalilzad is Ambassador
to Iraq. He is PNAC. Paul Wolfowitz is the head of the World Bank. He is
PNAC. So are Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Scooter Libby. Need I go on?
If undeterred, they can proceed at full speed with their global domination
agenda. Only now things don’t look to good, and if the rumor about the
indictments is true, something will have to be done. This something, according
to the rumor mill, will be a false flag terror operation in the form of a
limited nuclear attack on our own soil. This will permit the PNAC crazies
to freeze our government, implement martial law and maintain absolute
dictatorship level powers indefinitely. Don’t put it past this dangerous
gang of radicals to do this.
Here are my two cents: In my scenario George W. Bush does not survive an
attack. I say this for several reasons:
1. Bush is not a PNAC member. Cheney runs the show. Bush has been a burden
for these people. They have to teach him what to say, how to present his
little issues, tutor him, give him his sound bites, etc. He could not even
handle one hour in front of the friendly 9/11 Commission by himself; Cheney
had to accompany him. He had nothing to do with creating the PNAC agenda
and by getting him out of the way Cheney and crew can move faster and harder.
2. If George Bush were no longer President, it would add to the power of
the PNAC crew. If you think they assumed great power because 3,000 anonymous
Americans died, just imagine how much more power they can assume after claiming
that terrorists are a great enough threat to get to an American president.
Bush would be the sacrificial poster boy. He would have served his purpose
and would no longer be needed. He would provide PNAC with more power than
they ever could achieve if he had lived. An interesting side note is that
George W. Bush’s Skull and Bones nickname is “Temporary!”
Interesting, to say the least.
3. Also, look for a hit on Chicago . The records and principles involved
in the Plame investigation have to be eliminated. Just as a great deal of
Enron information perished in the WTC, the criminal evidence against PNAC
members must disappear. How convenient that would be.
Do I know for certain that any of this will happen? NO, OF COURSE NOT! The
idea that the US will experience a nuclear terror event and it will unfold
as I describe IS INDEED A CONSPIRACY THEORY. I repeat THIS IS A CONSPIRACY
THEORY!!! However, the information used to compile my theory, most notably
the goals and motives of the PNAC crazies is NOT THEORY; it is FACT. And
if my frightening theory got you to pay attention to the people who are really
running this country, this blog entry has accomplished its goal.
OK, so there is my brain dump. Why am I sharing this with you? I am writing
this because, amazingly, I know more about the thugs in PNAC than almost
every single person I meet, anywhere. With the exception of the people I
have met through running TvNewsLIES.org, almost everyone I know or meet is
clueless as to who the PNAC people are and knows nothing whatsoever about
their agenda. Even some the most informed activists against this administration
are unaware of the affiliation, the intrigue, and the cabal that is PNAC.
So many Americans have no idea about the people behind the people who run
the government, and I feel it is about time to turn that around. If your
curiosity has been piqued at all, I’ve done something worthwhile.
Please let me be wrong! But if I am correct…let’s not wait until
it’s too late to listen to what I am saying! We could be talking about
life and death.
Peace,
Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org
9/11-PNAC, 9/11-PNAC SHOULD BE THE #1 TOPIC OF DISCUSSION - A WAKE-UP CALL
THE ALTERNATIVE AND LIBERAL MEDIA: TO STOP IGNORING 9/11 AND THE PROJECT
FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
They Are Not “Conspiracy Theories” - They Are, in Fact,
“Discoveries”
Posted by Jesse on Thursday, August 4th, 2005 at 10:01 am.
3 Responses to “More About Those Nuclear Attack
--------------------------------------------
Newsweek
2
Leak Investigation: An Oversight Issue?
 |
Aug. 15, 2005 issue - The departure this week of Deputy Attorney
General James Comey, who has accepted the post of general counsel at Lockheed
Martin, leaves a question mark in the probe into who leaked the identity
of CIA operative Valerie Plame. Comey was the only official overseeing special
counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's leak investigation.
With Attorney General Alberto Gonzales recused, department officials
say they are still trying to resolve whom Fitzgerald will now report to.
Associate Attorney General
Robert McCallum
is "likely" to be named as acting deputy A.G., a DOJ official who asked not
to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter tells NEWSWEEK.
But McCallum may be seen as having his own conflicts: he is an old friend
of President Bush's and a member of his Skull and Bones class at
Yale. |
One question: how much authority Comey's successor will have over
Fitzgerald. When Comey appointed Fitzgerald in 2003, the deputy granted him
extraordinary powers to act however he saw fit—but noted he still had
the right to revoke Fitzgerald's authority. The questions are pertinent because
law-yers close to the case believe the probe is in its final stages. Fitzgerald
recently called White House aide Karl Rove's secretary and his former top
aide to testify before the grand jury. They were asked why there was no record
of a phone call from Time reporter Matt Cooper, with whom Rove discussed
the CIA agent, says a source close to Rove who requested anonymity because
the FBI asked participants not to comment. The source says the call went
through the White House switchboard, not directly to Rove.
FLOCCO: Following on the heels
of these reports, we have learned from U.S. intelligence sources that federal
agents are prepared to immediately arrest Mr. Bush if he fires Fitzgerald
and seeks to obstruct justice and commit additional treasonous acts regarding
ongoing grand jury proceedings against his administration and himself.
NOTE:
Tom
Flocco's site repeatedly compromised
Forum
2
