|
 |
 .. |
|
|
.. |
The Incredible Investigations of Elaine Lucas
I happened to see an article about Stongehenge, today, and it included the coordinates (there were mins and secs, too, which you can't do on that PDS map) but rounded out it's 51x2. Soooo, I thought I'd take a look and see what was on Mars at 51x2 and guess what I found?! A little worse for the wear, but it sure looks like the Stonehenge shape to me. Now this might not be an odd structure to find on Mars but to find it at the exact same coordinates as Stonehenge on Earth. I think that's a little more than strange! Another coincidence? Elaine Lucas
THIS KIND OF SEARCH AND VERIFICATION AVAILABLE TO ALL:
The Bluestones (no relation to the Bluestars...I don't think) :) About 2,000 BC, the first stone circle (which is now the inner circle), comprised of small bluestones, was set up, but abandoned before completion. The stones used in that first circle are believed to be from the Prescelly Mountains, located roughly 240 miles away, at the southwestern tip of Wales. The bluestones weigh up to 4 tons each and about 80 stones were used, in all. Given the distance they had to travel, this presented quite a transportation problem...
Construction of the Outer Ring The giant sarsen stones (which form the outer circle), weigh as much as 50 tons each. To transport them from the Marlborough Downs, roughly 20 miles to the north, is a problem of even greater magnitude than that of moving the bluestones. Most of the way, the going is relatively easy, but at the steepest part of the route, at Redhorn Hill, modern work studies estimate that at least 600 men would have been needed just to get each stone past this obstacle.... |
.
.
|
SEARCH & IMAGES SUBMITTED BY CAROL
NOBEL, ENGLAND
.
MORE: CONTINUE
MARS-GROOM
LAKE: A STARTLING COMPARISON
